We performed a comparison between Quad9 and Zscaler Internet Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Internet Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Setting up Quad9 is straightforward if you know what you're doing, and it's easy to use overall."
"The most valuable feature of Quad9 is that it is a free solution."
"In terms of management and visibility, there is a single panel where you can configure the policies for your entire organisation worldwide."
"The initial setup was straightforward. The biggest thing for us was to build our own policies. The deployment itself was only a few hours."
"We enjoy all of the proxy capabilities and the capability to integrate into the SIEM/SOC solution."
"It is easy to set up the solution."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten...The setup phase was easy."
"The cloud proxy and integration are some of the key features. Since there is cloud waste, we can quickly provision it and start working on the configuration. On top of that, they have added a few more features. They have integrated CASB, and file sandboxing is part of it."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to drop packets."
"The solution is stable."
"Quad9 could improve by having more free features, such as custom DNS filtering."
"It used to work fine for all the devices, but it started to slow and become non-responsive. I would have to reload the page two or three times before all the pages loaded. With OpenDNS, I only need to load the page once."
"Zscaler should provide adjacent services, which would be complementary to their current offering that could to be more pragmatic for a customer. For example, if you take Akamai, you get multiple sets of services, all depending on the customer and the strategy and the complexity and the problems. In some areas, they are more varied in terms of coverage."
"They should enhance the audit reporting feature."
"Technical support could be better."
"Sometimes, support isn't available."
"We'd like for them to include some sort of antivirus tool."
"Sometimes it's not easy to use during large deployments of workstations."
"An improvement would be if they could provide an out-of-the-box experience, like 20 to 30 features all ready to go. In comparison, LogRhythm offers out-of-the-box features. With Zscaler Internet Access, there is firewall IPS, multiple security services, filtering, DLP, and CASB browser isolation. These are things that all users are going to be using. However, when an administrator or architect would start building this, I would definitely need to engage professional services to help clients do it."
"Currently, the solution's interface is not that user-friendly."
Quad9 is ranked 11th in Internet Security with 2 reviews while Zscaler Internet Access is ranked 2nd in Internet Security with 46 reviews. Quad9 is rated 6.0, while Zscaler Internet Access is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Quad9 writes "It's easy to use and set up, but I've faced performance problems ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Internet Access writes "Provides integrated CASB and file sandboxing but could be less expensive ". Quad9 is most compared with Cloudflare DNS, Google Cloud DNS, Cisco Umbrella, Verisign Public DNS and Amazon Route 53, whereas Zscaler Internet Access is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Netskope , Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and FortiSASE . See our Quad9 vs. Zscaler Internet Access report.
See our list of best Internet Security vendors.
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.