We performed a comparison between Odin Virtuozzo Containers and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"The benefit of the solution is that you can create template-based servers within minutes. If you were to use a physical server, it would probably take several hours, if not a whole day, to get everything set up the way you need."
"VMware vSphere has very good applications and services."
"The most valuable features are the vMotion, the storage vMotion, the DRS, and the high availability function."
"We are able to increase the density of the virtualized servers and, with the increased density we have a lot of page sharing as well as memory sharing."
"Scalability is the big advantage of it. The product itself allows us to scale on the fly as we need it, and plan for the future."
"The most valuable feature is being able to VMotion and migrate easily, moving machines around on the host. I know DRS will take care of a lot about that, but there's still some manual intervention here and there, so the flexibility of it has been really good."
"An easy way of providing near-zero downtime services, the operation of the instances between clustered services, and providing the projected SLA for our customers."
"We could easily move workloads from on-premises to the cloud and vice versa if we were running on-premises and cloud, which is one of the most important points in the new releases, in particular."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
"It is not easy to upgrade VMware vSphere from an old version to a new version."
"The license fee could be more affordable."
"The setup is easy. However, the configuration expansion can be difficult. The full implementation took three to four days. This included the move from physical servers to virtual ones."
"The management could be simplified for base-level customers, but of course, it would be difficult to match all customer needs."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
"The solution could be more stable."
"I’d like to see a better web console or rather, transform the web console in a real single pane of glass for the whole infrastructure instead of having to go for vRealize Ops Manager."
"The one area where I would love to see an improvement is the HTML5 client. It's great, but it could get better."
Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 12th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 446 reviews. Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers good performance and is useful for banking systems". Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Nutanix AHV Virtualization, Hyper-V and KVM, whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, Oracle VM, VMware Workstation and KVM.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
