We performed a comparison between Hyper-V and Odin Virtuozzo Containers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."It is stable."
"We appreciate how easy this solution is to implement on standalone severs."
"It is definitely the toughest competitor for VMware. It easily increases memory for our virtual machines."
"Hyper-V deployment is very user-friendly. It supports partial scripting and offers a UI for a smooth experience. There's also PowerShell scripting available for advanced users."
"It is actually very low on resources. It doesn't use many resources. It is also very easy to tailor. You can change things like the amount of memory and storage on the fly. It is very stable and reliable. I like its replication feature, which is very good. It is also very easy to move the virtual machines across push servers without any difficulty. Its performance is also very good. Now with this pandemic, a lot of workers are working from home. A lot of workers have been using laptops as their desktop computers, and they would remote into a virtual PC. There is no difficulty, and they can't tell the difference between this and the real one. It is much easier to manage."
"The solution is very powerful, easy to use, user-friendly, and integrates well with Windows. If you are looking for a hundred percent Microsoft environment it would be a good idea to go with Hyper-V. They work wonderfully together."
"I think all of these improvements are going in a good direction. For me, its direction is good and I'm very satisfied with this product."
"The solution is stable."
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"The interface could be more user friendly. In addition, the documentation and security could use improvement."
"The pricing and technical support can be improved."
"When one server or one virtual machine fails, or one is turned off, the virtualization stops, and we have to initiate again with human intervention."
"If you have a bigger implementation, you need more tools to coexist with many, many features that are not present in the base Hyper-V."
"Hyper-V could benefit with improvements to their management interface."
"They could work on lowering the cost of the solution."
"It needs additional administration and monitoring capabilities."
"The product can be a bit difficult to use."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
Hyper-V is ranked 3rd in Server Virtualization Software with 134 reviews while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 12th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews. Hyper-V is rated 8.0, while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Hyper-V writes "It's a low-cost solution that enabled us to shrink everything down into a single server ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". Hyper-V is most compared with VMware vSphere, VMware Workstation, Proxmox VE and KVM, whereas Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Nutanix AHV Virtualization, KVM and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.