We performed a comparison between N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management and TeamViewer Remote Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like being able to get a picture of what's happening on a computer. I can just click on it, and I can see the CPU usage and the memory usage and what services and programs are currently running. I can connect remotely to a computer. All these are very useful."
"The most valuable aspect of N-able Remote Monitoring & Management is it provides an all-in solution for the different solutions."
"The integrated backup and the scripting are good."
"We like that this solution is in real-time, it gives us real-time monitoring."
"The most helpful feature is script deployment because we can create whatever we want to deploy on our devices. This works in a cloud environment, where we previously relied on Active Directory. Since the start of the COVID outbreak, all the staff members began working from home, and most of the people there did not use the VPN to transfer the policies."
"The reporting for this solution has been most valuable."
"The solution provides an administration panel where we can see what is happening on our client's stations, such as events, alerts, and all the software installed."
"Remote support has been very handy. It also lets us know if there are failing hard drives or Windows issues."
"The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management is very simple."
"Almost all the features are valuable to me, like the scalable feature and its highly interactive software."
"I like the possibility of using this software across different operating systems and clouds, such as AWS or Azure Cloud, while being able to efficiently transfer files and run the data."
"The product is very stable."
"We use the product to communicate."
"Transferring files and viewing data work well with TeamViewer Remote Management."
"The stability seems to be pretty good so far."
"It enhances collaboration among my board members during board meetings, whether annual, regular, or irregular."
"The patch management of the solution could improve."
"The reporting could be more customizable. RMM pulls a vast amount of data, but you need to filter through it to get a decent executive report each month. I'm pulling reports all day through the XML file and such to get the information our executive needs. They don't want a 34-megabyte Excel spreadsheet, but the overview only provides limited information, like a basic breakdown."
"There are disconnection issues sometimes."
"It would be great if the pricing model could be improved and the solution was more affordable."
"We haven't had it for very long, and we're finally getting comfortable with it. The biggest improvement probably would be a little more clarification. It has few exclamation points or attention-getters when there is a computer that doesn't have the up-to-date patches, etc. However, it's not specific in terms of what you need to do. Sometimes, it says it requires a reboot, and you reboot it, but the same message still shows up. Sometimes, the messages that it gives you about how to resolve an issue are not very easy to understand."
"There is quite a bit of delay on the portal where we receive monitoring information from the endpoint agent on the remote device. Sometimes it gets stuck with no live response from the device, and you have to refresh the portal just to make sure that it's projecting the right information."
"The SentinelOne integration is not great."
"The product looks a bit old-fashioned."
"Integration with other tools would be great."
"If there were a way for users to do access reporting, that would be an ideal addition to the product."
"The solution is a bit expensive. It could be cheaper."
"The price point would probably be an area of improvement with the number of competitors out there offering similar features. TeamViewer usually comes in a little high as compared to other solutions."
"It could be more secure."
"The compatibility needs improvement in TeamViewer Remote Management because there's some incompatibility in some versions of the solution. Some solutions require the higher-performing version of TeamViewer Remote Management. Otherwise, there's incompatibility. The security provided by TeamViewer Remote Management in terms of data transfer also needs improvement. I'd like to see more features in the next release of TeamViewer Remote Management because it's still lacking in features. It would also be good for TeamViewer Remote Management to have a built-in remoting program similar to what Itarian has."
"Licensing has always been a concern, as it can be costly when we need simultaneous access for multiple users."
"There could be stable connectivity for the product’s current technology."
More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is ranked 6th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 13 reviews while TeamViewer Remote Management is ranked 3rd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 33 reviews. N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is rated 8.2, while TeamViewer Remote Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management writes "User-friendly and allows you to do different activities on a single interface, and gives you visibility into multiple devices, but its reporting interface and report generation could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Remote Management writes "Highly stable and scalable solution". N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is most compared with N-able N-central, Zabbix, ConnectWise RMM, NinjaOne and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas TeamViewer Remote Management is most compared with Azure Bastion, NinjaOne, Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and Kaseya VSA. See our N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer Remote Management report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
