We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The most valuable feature is the compatibility with other Microsoft components."
"It uses a lot of AI, which is helpful, especially during the setup process."
"Overall the solution is reliable."
"We get feedback on a real-time basis, which is actually very useful for us."
"For all no-code platforms that let you create a front end, you can click together something very quick."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Model-driven or Canvas application-making platforms. The power of the two gives us exactly what we are looking for."
"We like that this solution allows us to fully define our test environments, and link them using different code. This means we can do different tests, but with one basic structure, and then export the data and use it in other platforms."
"It's very easy to build an app using this solution."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"Microsoft PowerApps can improve the number of bugs that are present. When you are using the different applications it is not accurate."
"Microsoft PowerApps can be more costly for small teams or organizations."
"I would like to see more improvement, for example, in direct collaboration."
"PowerApps can't do a lot of things that users need now. For example, it can't handle signatures."
"The stability of this solution could be better."
"The editor in the Web browser could be improved because it can be difficult to implement the commands in the buttons."
"The notion people have is that no code equals no knowledge, and that's simply not true. Even though you don't have to write codes, you still have to know what you're doing."
"I’d need more time with it. As of now, I can’t think of an area for improvement."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while Pillir is ranked 42nd in Rapid Application Development Software. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Pillir is most compared with .
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.