We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Verified ID and Microsoft Intune based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft and others in Microsoft Security Suite."I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."
"Conditional access helps me control uncontrolled access."
"...Intune itself integrates with that entire Microsoft ecosystem. As an individual product itself, it's okay. It holds up. But when you start saying "I've bought this as part of a wider solution, as a company we are going Microsoft throughout," then it makes more sense to have Microsoft Intune... so you have that single dashboard."
"I haven't used other mobile device management solutions, but compared to SCCM, we eliminate a lot of on-premises infrastructure and maintenance by using Intune."
"The most valuable includes managing everything from a single console."
"The ability to manage devices with different sets of policies is most valuable."
"The many policies available in Microsoft Intune for managing our devices are valuable."
"The biggest thing for us is enforcing logins only from devices that are managed by Intune."
"It is a very helpful solution."
"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."
"The difficulty of the the roll out is surprisingly difficult considering this product is supposed to be an integrated part of the 365 suite."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"There can be more logs. I do not have any other requirements."
"In the next release, I would like a feature to be able to properly lock down the device. For example, if an attacker or somebody steals the phone, you can be sure that the pin cannot be broken."
"The feature that allows us to import the business application from the configuration manager to Intune is not very good at this time."
"The add-ons must be integrated into the solution."
"The reports that are generated aren't so great. They don't give a lot of meaning so far, but that could be down to user knowledge than the actual reporting side of things. I'm not a big user of it, but I was a bigger user of MaaS360, and we used to be able to run weekly and monthly reports. In the case of any deviations. we'd get a warning immediately. That's not so easy to do or to get in place for Intune. This could be just a user issue, but when I compare both, that's the only thing that's lacking for me."
"Onboarding of endpoint devices is not straightforward. The onboarding process was a little heavier than I thought it would be. That's the key improvement area. Obviously, the more control you have over the devices, the better it is."
Microsoft Entra Verified ID is ranked 24th in Microsoft Security Suite with 1 review while Microsoft Intune is ranked 3rd in Microsoft Security Suite with 165 reviews. Microsoft Entra Verified ID is rated 6.0, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Verified ID writes "Offers single sign-on feature for business applications but needs to offer personalized insights ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Microsoft Entra Verified ID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Defender for Identity, Okta Customer Identity, Auth0 and Microsoft Purview Data Governance, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Microsoft Security Suite vendors.
We monitor all Microsoft Security Suite reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
