We performed a comparison between Kaseya IT Center and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a product that is very easy to learn."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"Technical support is very helpful and very responsive."
"We're a Microsoft-centric organization, so we are happy with the integration between products."
"Patching is very effective and reporting is very good."
"The scalability to deploy the package."
"Offers good patching."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's incredibly simple to configure and execute changes in bulk, allowing for seamless deployment. With this solution, you can easily track the status of all modifications and send them with ease, making it a comprehensive and efficient solution for any necessary adjustments."
"The most valuable feature is the graphical-based reports of software updates that have been successful, the ones that have failed, and a summary of where the failures are what security breaches may occur."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is the availability of being able to manage the Microsoft estate. It handles many areas, such as asset management and tracking."
"At times, there is degradation in performance."
"In Kaseya, agents are shown as offline at times, and it is an area that is being improved."
"Troubleshooting in general needs improvement. There's just a ton of logs to go through, and so finding the error log that corresponds with that you're doing can sometimes be difficult."
"Devices like smartphones and tablets are managed very well on VMware, however, they are absent in SCCM. I could configure iPad from the VMware site and it was done very easily. It should be just as possible on SCCM."
"In spite of us being a premier customer we find the support unsatisfactory."
"The cost of the product can be improved."
"The solution is on-premises. The cloud version of the product, if a person needs to be on the cloud, would be InTune, which already exists as an option. SCCM doesn't need to offer cloud features for this reason."
"Initial setup was complex. There's a lot that goes into it."
"It is a bit of an old and outdated product."
"The solution does not support remote devices so the CMG is still required."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaseya IT Center is ranked 21st in Server Monitoring with 3 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews. Kaseya IT Center is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Kaseya IT Center writes "A tool that helps a user speed up the process of installation and automate certain processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". Kaseya IT Center is most compared with Tanium, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium. See our Kaseya IT Center vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.