We performed a comparison between Jira and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The level of stability is quite good."
"It was very easy to learn Jira. As a scrum master, I run daily stand-ups, and they are run directly from Jira. The feature that I really love in Jira is called Issue Navigator. It allows me to customize how I want to show the user stories within Jira to my squad."
"The solution offers a lot of plugins."
"It handles all of the issues that we need it to do."
"The most valuable feature is that it has different APIs available, with good services, and it is completely by the books."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the configuration, being able to configure it to suit your own needs."
"There are a lot of different plugins for Jira. Unfortunately, we did not test so many and the big pain point for us is the rigorous handling and the roadmap of Jira. We have a portfolio and structure plugin and we have our story map plugin in Jira"
"Provides good output and is user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"I struggle with Epics, how they are implemented in JIRA, because they don't work like any other Story, I see a list of Epics, but although I can order them, there are some mismatches with how the Epics are used compared to what Scrum expects, or what Story mapping expects an Epic to be."
"I have noticed a problem with Jira in the Philippines. In the Philippines, there are only a few companies that offer local support, which is alarming."
"I want Jira to have more plug-ins, which will allow for more free plug-ins that help with the area of reporting."
"It would be ideal if Jira had future functionalities to integrate more easily with various aspects of code reviews."
"The Classic UI is a little bit messy. UX experience is also a little bit messy and is not according to the expectation of a tech user."
"As the solution is highly configurable, it has very poor governance."
"The filtration could be better."
"Jira could provide more insight into sprints such as how did we perform in the last sprint compared to other sprints. It would be helpful to have metrics and a dashboard feature for others to see."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
Earn 20 points
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Jira is rated 8.2, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps. See our Jira vs. PractiTest report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.