We performed a comparison between Informatica Axon and OneTrust DataGovernance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon has been the data marketplace."
"The features that I have found most valuable are, first of all, that it comes as part of this whole bundle of Informatica tools. So if you've been implementing Informatica MDM across a business, you'd often find it comes with it. It's been thrown in as a sweetener. The adoption of it is often the challenge because as part of your MDM project, governance is seen as something beyond the MDM and is often restrictive. So this tool actually, for the first time, when you talk to data governance teams, gives a holistic view of what a data governance team can do with this tool."
"Some of Axon's valuable features include creating your business glossaries, importing DQ rules, and creating change management."
"The features for data quality, data cataloging, and UI are excellent."
"The feature of auto-onboarding of the assets, enterprise assets via EDC is good."
"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to select the data flow and lineage."
"It is a scalable product."
"It's helpful in integration, and it can be moved around in SharePoint. So, from the SharePoint View, data integration and reporting, it help a lot in that way."
"This product makes it easy to manage personal data."
"The tool gives us the ability to trace the path of an incident."
"One valuable aspect of the solution is its cloud-based nature. Users can just pay the fees and get started instantly."
"There are also some technical issues sometimes with integrations because clients have a lot of different types of data sources."
"Informatica Axon needs more integration connectors so that it can connect to systems and different kinds of datasets."
"The GUI needs to be a little more user-friendly and appealing."
"There is room for improvement in the support. The response time could be faster."
"I would like to have the solution in one product and technical support needs to be better."
"Permissions, scalability, and connection with other informatic tools are the main areas that need development. Integration with other tools, such as IDQ, is challenging. The management of data discovery is highly challenging because many data points have identical definitions."
"They could improve technical support because it is not good enough at the moment."
"The stability and the integration of the solution have room for improvement."
"The tool is an amalgam. It's a collection of loosely integrated pieces and parts that don't work well together. There is room for improvement there. My team reached out to the support team, and their experience was not satisfactory."
"The integration with third-party products could be better."
"Deployment is a big issue."
Informatica Axon is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 23 reviews while OneTrust DataGovernance is ranked 24th in Data Governance with 3 reviews. Informatica Axon is rated 7.8, while OneTrust DataGovernance is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Informatica Axon writes "It has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneTrust DataGovernance writes "Good cloud-based solution requiring improvement in terms of integration". Informatica Axon is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and Varonis Platform, whereas OneTrust DataGovernance is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, BigID, Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager, Varonis Platform and Alation Data Catalog. See our Informatica Axon vs. OneTrust DataGovernance report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.