We performed a comparison between iland Secure Cloud Backup and Veeam Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Backup solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"They have just implemented a Backup and Restore portal that we think is very good."
"The service itself wasn't bad."
"iland is excellent as far as the interface."
"It's fairly easy to manage and set up."
"The initial setup for a simple environment is very easy. We just do next, next, next, next for the installation. It can be complicated in a complicated environment. It can be simple for a simple environment. I enjoy installing it. It has a lot of features."
"I consider the solution's technical support to be excellent, perfect."
"The replication is the most valuable feature for us."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"The main feature for Veeam is that it's built primarily for virtualization, such as VMware or Hyper-V."
"The backup and replication features are most valuable."
"The backups we have been receiving from Veeam Backup Replication on-premise have been good."
"They don't support a more current version of VMware."
"The vendor needs to changes billing to work like every other business and stop charging people if they stop using your service."
"I would like to see a better method of backing up Exchange in the cloud."
"The replication process is very slow. It takes too long to replicate a virtual machine."
"If you do not use the standard software and you go with a third-party solution such as this one, it might not work the same. There is an integration issue I understand between the database standards."
"Scalability, as well as licensing costs, need to be improved."
"It's a great product, but only if you have everything virtualized."
"In terms of what can be improved, I would say they could add automations for disaster migrations and for reverse replication. Overall, they need more automation."
"The direct SAN backup integration can be perfected by improving the snapshot removal mechanism and process from the storage volumes."
"The implementation of the features can be improved. Currently, there is no segregation of duty. Normally, any backup software or client service software is implemented in a way where one person is responsible for the implementation of the server, and one is responsible for the client, but Veeam Backup & Replication is not implemented in that way. Therefore, restores don't work like that. The backup guys have to do the restores, which is not a good thing. Its pricing should also be improved. It is quite expensive."
"I would prefer it if the backup console did not require use of a specified program but rather that it could be opened from any website."
Earn 20 points
iland Secure Cloud Backup is ranked 40th in Cloud Backup while Veeam Backup & Replication is ranked 1st in Cloud Backup with 329 reviews. iland Secure Cloud Backup is rated 6.4, while Veeam Backup & Replication is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of iland Secure Cloud Backup writes "Easy to setup, reasonably priced, and the portal works well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup & Replication writes "Beneficial pricing model, user friendly interface, and many free features". iland Secure Cloud Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, whereas Veeam Backup & Replication is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, Azure Backup, Rubrik, Zerto and Veritas NetBackup. See our Veeam Backup & Replication vs. iland Secure Cloud Backup report.
See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
