We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."We have one MDM that works with Windows, iOS, and Android."
"Compliance and the policies that can be set are the most valuable features."
"It's easy to manage."
"The one feature we find most useful is the Mobile Application Manager. There are two types, we have the complete MDM and the Mobile Application Manager(MAM). We don't give our users phones, it is their own personal phone, and we need to allow them to have access to the company detail on their phone. We need to create a balance between their own personal data and the company data. We deploy the Mobile Application Manager for them so that we won't be able to interfere with their own personal data."
"I like how Microsoft Intune lets me lock down the email profile and make it accessible only on certain devices."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"We already use a lot of Microsoft products in our company, and therefore, it made sense to also use this product."
"It is a stable solution."
"One valuable feature is the ability to provide a secure environment. Another is the kiosk mode where MaaS360 can be used over a tablet or mobile device to ensure that a single application is used."
"The most valuable feature is the fact that we can find a lost device or shut the device down and wipe it is good for HIPAA."
"The solution is quite stable."
"It helped us reduce the number of support incidents by limiting users' access to device configurations."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"We've found the scalability to be very good."
"Mobile Device Configuration with policy applying: This significantly reduces time of device configuration."
"The most valuable features of IBM MaaS360 are remote control and setting up a phone."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"I'm still playing around with it and haven't had any issues with the product yet, but support can definitely be improved."
"Could benefit from user having more control over devices."
"The security features should be improved."
"From a new user's perspective, it may be a little overwhelming because there are quite a few things to look at in the console, however, once you are sort of acclimated and are familiar with your core functions, it's fairly simple and straightforward."
"They need to integrate more with security options."
"It would be beneficial to have a more straightforward understanding of Intune's capabilities, presented in a simplified manner."
"An area for improvement is the absence of seamless integration, particularly with external dashboards."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The price could be lower."
"It would be ideal to add support for the distribution of windows.exe applications."
"IBM MaaS360 can improve the information provided for DLP control. Some of our customers would benefit from this."
"We had a problem with Microsoft computers. If you downloaded emails on a Microsoft Windows Surface PC, that would also require a license. The Outlook application didn't look great for us on a PC."
"The user experience really isn't so good."
"IBM MaaS360’s threat management feature needs improvement. It could identify even more malicious attacks."
"When we have MaaS360 installed on smartphones, it consumes the battery of the device at a much faster pace. This is one of the areas of improvement that I would like to highlight. We have also observed that in the contact list, a lot of duplication is happening. A single contact is duplicated three or four times, which also consumes more memory resources. If they can work on improving it for these aspects, it will have a more positive impact not only on the way the application is being consumed by the user but also on user satisfaction. A lot of new features are being deployed or rolled out by companies that are competitors of IBM MaaS360. IBM will have to ensure that all those features are on board so that we have a complete suite of features in the platform, rather than deploying multiple diverse solutions to cater to the requirements of our customers."
"Its integration with Microsoft Teams could be better."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, SOTI MobiControl, Jamf Pro, IBM MobileFirst and JumpCloud, whereas ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Google Endpoint Management, VMware Workspace ONE and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.