We performed a comparison between Datadog and WhatsUp Gold based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Datadog offers valuable features like dashboards, reporting, error reporting, log centralization, user-friendliness for development teams, and flexibility with AI and ML capabilities. WhatsUp Gold is highly valued for its ability to automatically scan for rogue devices, cost-effectiveness, NetFlow monitoring, and server health and uptime. Datadog could enhance its usability, integration, user interface, learning curve, external website monitoring, and SSL security. WhatsUp Gold could improve its release cadence, clarity of point system, real-time monitoring, configuration management, and integration with different vendors.
Service and Support: The customer service for Datadog has been commended for its prompt and readily available assistance. Users have reported receiving instant responses and timely support. However, there have been instances of slow or unresponsive support, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. WhatsUp Gold customer service has received a range of feedback. Some users have praised the technical support as excellent and helpful while others have encountered challenges in reaching out to support and have noted a scarcity of certified engineers in certain countries.
Ease of Deployment: Users find the initial setup of Datadog to be simple and uncomplicated, often receiving help from service providers or technical support. WhatsUp Gold's setup process is also described as uncomplicated and straightforward, especially for smaller teams.
Pricing: Datadog's setup cost has mixed opinions, with some users finding it expensive while others find it reasonable. The pricing model can be confusing and may become costly if certain features are extensively used. WhatsUp Gold offers clear pricing per device per year, without any hidden fees. Its price is considered good and reasonable, and licenses are perpetual and auto-renewable.
ROI: Users have reported experiencing varying levels of ROI with Datadog. Some have mentioned that they have achieved high ROI through time savings and faster debugging. However, there is no specific mention of the ROI for WhatsUp Gold, and the user reviews for this product vary.
Comparison Results: Datadog emerges as the preferred choice when compared to WhatsUp Gold. Users highly appreciate the ease of use and setup of Datadog, along with its impressive dashboards, error reporting, log centralization, and troubleshooting features. Its user-friendliness for development teams, user interface, integrations, and observability capabilities are also valued.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We have been able to set very specific CPU and memory alerts, at the very base level, then we started to pull real business value, like 99th percentile response rates for our API calls."
"The integration into AWS is key as well as our software is currently bound to AWS."
"The product has offered increased visibility via logging APM, metrics, RUM, etc."
"This is definitely a good product and I would consider them one of the leaders within the application monitoring and cloud monitoring space."
"The tools are powerful and intuitive to set up."
"Datadog provides tracing and logging, whereas Dynatrace focuses on tracing, and Splunk is more of a logging tool. Datadog's advantage is that we don't need two tools."
"We have a better grasp of what is occurring during the deployment cycle. If something fails, we have an idea what has failed, where it has failed, and how it failed to better mitigate the situation."
"The application performance monitoring is pretty good."
"We no longer have to manually search for problems because we are alerted when something in the network goes down."
"I use it on premises to monitor my network database. We monitor the link up/down and use the SNMP traps as well."
"It handles the basics of monitoring."
"The interface in the last few years it has been a lot greater, they are much more user-friendly. I like the interface."
"The most important features of WhatsUp Gold are the server health and uptime it provides. Additionally, WhatsUp Gold is a Windows-based solution which is a benefit."
"It is stable."
"The most valuable features are network bandwidth monitoring and monitoring device health."
"This is a good, stable network monitoring solution for devices."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The dashboard could be improved. It would be helpful to get a view of specific things that we need to monitor for our application."
"I would love to see support for front-end and mobile applications. Right now, it is mostly all back-end stuff. Being able to do some integration with our front-end products would be awesome."
"Since the Datadog platform has so many separate features, solving so many use cases, there are often inconsistencies in feature availability and interoperability between products."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Its settings should be improved for a better understanding of billing. They should also provide some alerts when there is an increase in the usage. For example, if there is 20% more increase from one week to another, the customer should get an alert."
"I'm not sure if Datadog can monitor K8s deployments in real-time. For instance, being able to see a deployment step by step visually. This would be helpful if there were any incidents during the deployment."
"We need to learn more about the session reply feature inside of DD."
"Ingesting data from various sources to monitor the log metrics of the system can always improve so that, if something goes wrong, the right teams are alerted."
"We would like to see some versioning system for the Synthetic Tests so that we could have a backup of our tests since they are time-consuming to make and very easy to damage in a moment of error."
"The new release cadence needs to be improved. It takes a while for them to add new features and functionality. There should be a quicker turnaround with new versions."
"I would like to see them do an enhancement to the application monitoring. A lot of other products do better application monitoring so they should do some improvements to the application monitoring."
"I might like to see a better interface in the future."
"You have to invest a few days to become an expert in this solution."
"Adding on services increases the cost and on the version we have there is no option for ATM monitoring."
"WhatsUp Gold should work on real-time monitoring and configuration management. If they succeed in doing this, the solution will cover all the network troubleshooting aspects and will be a benefit."
"The product is old and not updated."
"The licensing model could be improved. Right now, the levels are too far apart. This causes the solution to be more expensive than it needs to be."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews while WhatsUp Gold is ranked 31st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 22 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while WhatsUp Gold is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WhatsUp Gold writes "If CPU, memory, or disk space is over-utilized, it alerts us immediately via text or email if there is an issue". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics, whereas WhatsUp Gold is most compared with Grafana, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM, PRTG Network Monitor and Nagios XI. See our Datadog vs. WhatsUp Gold report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.