We performed a comparison between Cavisson NetDiagnostics and Dynatrace based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Its end-to-end dashboard provides information on all the integration callouts happening on the server side."
"By using Dynatrace Managed, we have improved customer satisfaction and have also helped internal teams and subcontractors make the application more stable."
"Email alert and mobile app alert are very useful for informing the team that something is going wrong."
"It is a product that helps developers, testers, and operations to make sure their applications work quickly and reliably."
"The real-user monitoring is mostly used to gauge the difference in performance for multitenant applications, This is so we can discern if there are any local network or client-facing issues when we do a comparison between each customer. It is quite important for us to be able to identify a client-side issue, as opposed to a feature managed problem, because we're essentially providing managed services of business applications."
"We found Dynatrace is a robust tool which provides pretty good monitoring for a PCF environment"
"We're able to pinpoint web and mobile interface issues before they trigger a negative customer experience."
"It scales well. We are going to be able to use it for everything we need. "
"We use Dynatrace for performance testing. We use it to dig down for application layer or slowness issues, getting a clear idea of what is causing the issues, then reporting back to the engineering team."
"They can improve on providing "help and navigation" for each feature available in the UI."
"To improve in Dynatrace the log analytics, this is the first thing that has to be enabled."
"SSO options are missing."
"I would like to see Dynatrace be more user-friendly. Sometimes there are too many options to use from, which is good, but it can become confusing on how to proceed."
"The con of Dynatrace is that, at times, because it has so much information, it becomes difficult to see the root cause of your problem, and then you have to dig around to find the root cause."
"Dynatrace has APIs, but they are unfriendly APIs. If they were friendly like Splunk or Sumo Logic had, we might integrate that same data on a single webpage, then start showing these internally."
"Include network monitoring in more detail for deep dive analytics of network components."
"Improvements are needed in the navigation and timeframe selection when browsing problems."
"We have had to resolve a lot of things and had a lot of issues with the tool."
Earn 20 points
Cavisson NetDiagnostics is ranked 87th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 341 reviews. Cavisson NetDiagnostics is rated 10.0, while Dynatrace is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cavisson NetDiagnostics writes "Improves our application at the code level because of its different performance metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". Cavisson NetDiagnostics is most compared with , whereas Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.