We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Flow and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."
"The initial setup is straightforward and easy. I would give it a nine out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to customize your rules and put them inside the tool."
"This solution is very stable."
"Integration is a big plus for me."
"It is efficient in reducing costs."
"It helps maintain, and in many instances, lower costs, as well as to maintain those costs, keeping them stable."
"IBM BPM is equipped with all the functionalities which are needed for building BPM enterprise-level applications."
"This solution has always been lacking in the user interface (UI), it needed to be improved a lot. However, from the acquisition of Spark UI, the UI is much better. Overall the solution is robust and has the ability to integrate with any product for complex workflows."
"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."
"Its stability could be improved."
"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."
"You must have good experience to work with it. It is not that easy. Its installation is complex, especially in the new version for business automation, and it could be improved. It has a safety application embedded inside it, and you need to do a lot of configuration to install it. I have been working for two days to resolve an issue."
"From the testing perspective and minor enhancements perspective, customization is something that is a little tedious as compared to new tools. In addition, various open-source tools that are available are not working with IBM BPM."
"Better integration with other products in the automation suite."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"The front end is not customised for a good user experience."
"All our clients are changing to microservice and cloud service. However, BPM does not have a solution for microservice and cloud service."
"The constant switch between Eclipse and its web versions can be annoying and confusing."
"Performance in the development environment space. I know that they have been taking it off the desktop version and putting on the web, and it is not 100% yet."
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is ranked 23rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is rated 8.0, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Flow writes "A competent solution for integrating enterprise-grade software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Boomi AtomSphere Flow is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, Apache Airflow, Pega BPM and Novacura Flow, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.