We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere API Management and Microsoft Azure API Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's stability is good."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a good product for integrating with Boomi as a backend service."
"Integrations take less time."
"AtomSphere API Management is a simple platform that's easy to use. If you're using it on-prem, there's a little learning curve."
"We can develop almost any interface that we need."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"We can create APIs straightforwardly and quickly and build jobs for data migration."
"AtomSphere is tightly integrated into the Boomi iPaaS platform. And Boomi has been augmenting AtomSphere API Management for the past couple of years so version 2.0 is better than 1.0."
"The solution has overall high performance."
"We're very satisfied with Azure API Management. We've had no issues with bugs, everything runs smoothly, and the connection between the cloud and the on-premise infrastructure was good."
"The integration with Azure Active Directory is a good security feature for authentication and authorization. There is multifactor authentication. You can also use all of the Azure AD features integrated with API Management."
"I like the API Management functions."
"I like the support they provide for the APIs more than the solution itself. First of all, documentation-wise, both Microsoft Azure and even Google Cloud are up there. But in comparison, the real-time consulting and support for APIs make Microsoft stand out a little. I also like the performance. Standard public cloud provider-built APIs are more resilient and flexible in terms of what feature you want to use and what feature you don't want to use, and they're more customizable. They are more resilient in terms of performance in that particular environment because that is the design aspect of the offering. When public clouds build APIs and deploy them after testing them on their framework for a certain amount of time, I feel there is a massive difference in the product's performance. On the interface, everything is strong."
"It's a very robust tool. So you see that there is a developer portal which can be used by developer or the vendors as well. And other external partners to create keys and manage their own APIs. The other thing is that they have a lot of policies there are too many options within API. So I do the difficult to tell one, but probably I would say, like, proxy sorry. The policies is one of the thing wherein you can just configure the policies and modify the behavior of the APIs."
"The most valuable features are the ease of use and it is a platform that has self-enablement for the customers to be able to register themselves."
"We use this solution for API rate limiting and for its security features against DDoS."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management can be improved in terms of threshold management and policy management."
"The product is really complex to manage."
"The solution must provide more AI services."
"To some degree, you need to know what type or amount of API you are creating - whether it's a rest API or web service API. You need to know ETL in order to really get the most out of Boomi."
"The API management has room for improvement."
"From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper."
"It's difficult to integrate the on-prem application with the Dell Boomi Cloud. We have to check to ensure the Dell domain engine is running. It just requires some service endpoints from our on-prem application to connect to Dell Boomi Cloud to make it available to integrate. It would be better if AtomSphere API Management were offered as a purely SaaS application, so I wouldn't need an on-prem component to make it available. We could make a test call or provide some connection parameters. That should enable it to pull the data."
"Most of the basic functionality is there in Boomi, but APG is a more feature-rich solution."
"One of the most important improvements for us would be if it supported the HTTP/3 version and new protocol over a quick connection."
"In terms of improvement, it would be helpful if they could develop an on-premises option."
"In the next release, Azure APIM should include deployment in various environments and CI/CD for deployment."
"I would like to see better scalability and better performance."
"Price is the first thing that comes to mind. It's quite expensive, which could be a barrier for some users."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"They should improve the inbuilt policies that they have and that should properly create a deployment architecture as well."
"The solution’s security and performance could be improved."
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere API Management is ranked 14th in API Management with 8 reviews while Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 1st in API Management with 68 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere API Management is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere API Management writes "Complex to manage, and the documentation is quite hard to learn, though APIs can be created quickly and easily". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Efficiently manages and monetizes API ". Boomi AtomSphere API Management is most compared with Apigee, Amazon API Gateway, Kong Gateway Enterprise and SwaggerHub, whereas Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Kong Gateway Enterprise and Axway AMPLIFY API Management. See our Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
