We performed a comparison between Bareos and Veeam Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Backup solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main benefit of the product is its backup feature."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of installation it provides its users."
"The direct SAN backup feature perfectly integrates with our 3PAR storage infrastructure."
"Veeam's file monitoring capabilities are strong and consistent."
"With regard to our operational requirements, Veeam is very good because it's so user-friendly."
"Veeam Backup Replication has good performance and can do location-to-location backups. Additionally, it is user-friendly and easy to manage."
"The data backup replication has been the most useful feature. Previously, we copied the data hub to an external hard drive but now we are able to store the backup on one of the depository service."
"I like how Veeam intuitively integrates with Zerto."
"Its stability and scalability were the main reasons for going for this solution. It is highly scalable, and its stability is also powerful. It has a friendly interface, and its monitoring and performance are the best in the market."
"Get only one interface to manage all backup sites, secure them with replication, and manage outside LTO media."
"The tool is not user-friendly."
"The virtual machine backup is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
"If a single file is corrupt then the restoration of the entire backup will fail."
"Pricing can be improved."
"The more features the solution has the more complex it can be to set up. Veeam Backup & Replication can be complex."
"Although the solution offers documentation, it has it only in English, which doesn't help us much in Belarus."
"The orchestration feature can be improved. They can improve the virtual machine orchestration to make it similar to VMware. They can also provide an option to automate the backup and recovery and schedule a backup."
"The direct SAN backup integration can be perfected by improving the snapshot removal mechanism and process from the storage volumes."
"They can improve the features and Veeam Enterprise Manager. The interface and features are kind of limited. It would be good if they can provide more features and a better interface. For example, if I want to provide certain users with the privilege to back up and restore and do day-to-day tasks, I cannot do it in the current version. It is like you either give everything to everyone or no user can have access to anything. In version 9, a lot of features were missing, and it wasn't clear. Version 10 is easier from the communication perspective, and the disk backup option is very clear."
"The solution needs more detailed reporting."
Bareos is ranked 31st in Cloud Backup with 2 reviews while Veeam Backup & Replication is ranked 1st in Cloud Backup with 329 reviews. Bareos is rated 7.6, while Veeam Backup & Replication is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bareos writes "The product is stable and enables users to create backups, but it is not user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup & Replication writes "Beneficial pricing model, user friendly interface, and many free features". Bareos is most compared with Bacula Enterprise and Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, whereas Veeam Backup & Replication is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, Azure Backup, Rubrik, Zerto and Veritas NetBackup. See our Bareos vs. Veeam Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
