We compared AWS Backup and Rubrik Go across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: AWS Backup is highly regarded for its flexibility and point-in-time recovery options. Users appreciate AWS Backup’s snapshot feature that allows them to back up applications to a secondary site. Rubrik Go is highly regarded for its impressive data visualization capabilities.
Room for Improvement: AWS Backup could enhance its reporting and visualization, user interface, encryption options, and troubleshooting indicators. Rubrik Go needs to address its expensive pricing and improve security visibility.
Service and Support: Some users described AWS Backup's customer service as amazing, but others noted that AWS support may take longer to resolve complex issues. Rubrik Go's support is recognized for its timely and effective resolution of customer issues.
Ease of Deployment: Users reported varying experiences setting up AWS Backup. Some said it took only a few minutes, but others said it could take up to 10 days. Rubrik Go is straightforward to set up and can be installed in just one day.
Pricing: AWS Backup’s pricing is generally regarded as reasonable and flexible. There are no licensing fees. Users are only charged for backup storage and data transfer. However, some users consider the model to be costly and complex. Rubrik Go is known for its higher pricing, which is charged on a monthly basis.
ROI: AWS Backup offers significant value by enabling backup restoration and readiness for unforeseen events. Rubrik Go offers a varying return. To obtain detailed insights, refer to user feedback or reach out to the respective providers.
Comparison Results: AWS Backup provides flexibility in services, point-in-time recovery, and seamless integration. At the same time, some users noted that AWS Backup requires specific configuration knowledge and has room for improvement in reporting and restore functionality. Rubrik Go stands out for its solid support and exceptional data visualization capabilities. Users say Rubrik Go needs to address its high cost and improve security visibility.
"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"We can directly back up EC2 instances in AWS without using any third-party applications."
"The auto-scaling feature and the time efficiency of setting up AWS Backup are the most valuable aspects for us."
"The solution has an effective overwrite feature."
"AWS Backup's most valuable feature is that you can configure it remotely to create backups."
"Reporting is one of the key elements that are valuable for C-suite executives. In terms of monitoring, the solution provides comprehensive details into ongoing processes, flagging issues and warnings as necessary."
"It provides an easy data migration process from on-premise to cloud."
"It is an easy-to-use solution."
"In terms of stability, the product is good."
"We use the solution as a backup for our virtual environment and SQL databases."
"The most valuable feature is the storage efficiency, as the storage footprint is very good."
"It has an easy-to-use interface that is not complicated."
"Rubrik Go's best feature is data visualization."
"Even though the data is already in the cloud, it's an AWS, so by accessing the on-prem appliance you can still search because it is indexed from that appliance."
"Rubrik Go is very simple to use."
"The standout feature is its ransomware protection capabilities."
"It requires a lot of time to connect the snapshot, identify the files, and restore a single file manually."
"The initial setup of the solution is complex."
"The tool is a good fit if your environment is VM-specific. However, it might not be the most suitable option if you have physical servers or an on-premise setup."
"One of the limitations of AWS Backup is that it only does file-based copying."
"One improvement I would like to see in AWS Backup is the implementation of incremental backups."
"If AWS Backup were a hybrid solution that also supported on-premises backups then it would be very helpful, especially if you are doing a migration to the cloud."
"AWS Backup could improve because you cannot use Glacier or anything but EFS."
"The AWS Backup backend reporting is a major area that needs improvement. We would be very excited if we can see some reporting, such as trends. We do understand that there are reports available for S3 Bucket, in which the AWS backend stores the data. However, if we can receive holistic reporting, then it would be very helpful for us."
"You should be able to add more workloads to Rubrik Go."
"Reporting could be improved. For now, it's only exported to CSB files."
"If you were to compare it to, say, EMC, the availability of the documentation, training programs, and end-user education aren't as good. Rubrik could improve this."
"The tool's pricing needs to be improved."
"I believe there's room for improvement in terms of support, particularly with Tier 3 support coming from the on-call team."
"Rubrik Go's security visibility could be improved."
"I would like to see better integration with applications, such as those from Microsoft, to make backing up from those applications simpler."
"Integration with the client is something that needs to be improved."
AWS Backup is ranked 5th in SaaS Backup with 23 reviews while Rubrik Go is ranked 8th in SaaS Backup with 10 reviews. AWS Backup is rated 8.0, while Rubrik Go is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Backup writes "Useful point-in-time recovery, highly scalable, and implementation straightforward". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik Go writes "Robust ransomware protection, scalability, and suitability for enterprise environments makes it a top choice for data management needs". AWS Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Veritas Alta SaaS Protection, whereas Rubrik Go is most compared with Commvault Cloud and Own Backup and Recovery. See our AWS Backup vs. Rubrik Go report.
See our list of best SaaS Backup vendors.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.