We performed a comparison between Asana and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."The initial setup was straightforward."
"The solution scales well."
"The most valuable feature of Asana is the ease of navigation."
"The general UI shows progress and data analytics for all projects in progress."
"Asana, despite its compact size, proves to be incredibly valuable. When initiating a project, it offers the ability to generate a personalized form for clients. In this particular context, my clients include the customer success team and solution architects. This feature allows me to provide them with a convenient means to submit their requests, resembling a ticketing system geared towards internal operations. Moreover, it enables efficient allocation within my team. For instance, if a question pertains to customer success, I can assign it to the CSOps manager and the team. Similarly, if it relates to a specific channel, it can be allocated accordingly."
"What I like the most about Asana is its API integrations because we use a lot of cluttered toolsets in our company since we need to cater to different clients, for which its integration gives us a lot of flexibility."
"It is pretty comprehensive when it comes to the different views that it gives you. It gives you a Gantt chart view, calendar view, board view, and list view. It is kind of helpful to have different types of views and see how it views your different tasks. I appreciate being able to do that. The biggest thing is that it is extremely user friendly. Asana is pretty intuitive. Someone who is not tech-savvy can kind of catch on quickly. It is better than other tools like Smartsheet. Some of the other tools like Microsoft Project and Excel are great tools, but you have to invest a lot of time to learn them, which is not the case with Asana."
"The most valuable feature of Asana is the tracking of comments and documents in one place."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users."
"The integration capabilities have been very useful."
"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."
"Valuable features include workflows (escalation, reminder, LazyApproval, actions, etc.) and ease of use."
"It can scale well."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"We'd like the capability to be able to set up weekly reminders."
"We don't get enough notifications."
"It's hard to integrate Asana into other parts of the company workflow, so integration is an area for improvement."
"Auto-shift is an essential feature for planning, but it's currently not there. It should have this feature so that when you move a task that depends on another task, the dates should be auto-shifted. For example, you have two tasks dependent on each other. When the parent task is moved or delayed, the child task should also be delayed, and the date should be shifted. When we have a very long timeline, it's very complex to go task by task and shift the dates on the task. Auto-shift is a fantastic and basic feature of project management, and having such a feature in Asana would make our lives much easier. If Asana added this feature, it would complete the suit and close the project management cycle because currently, there is a gap."
"It would be great if Asana could create a library for each project within the interface."
"The stability of Asana is good. However, there are some issues with maintenance, when the solution is down. For example, there might be maintained for a few hours where we cannot use the solution."
"Currently, there are only a few available options, but it would be helpful to have more control over the notifications received."
"For large teams, scalability should be improved."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."
"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
Asana is ranked 3rd in Project Management Software with 43 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Asana is rated 8.4, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Stands out with portfolios, easy setup, and real-time information, but needs big improvement when it comes to workflows, automation, and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". Asana is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Project, Wrike, monday.com and Jira, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
