We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The log digestion features from threat intelligence platforms like Recorded Future or Talos are valuable."
"Some of the most valuable features I really appreciate are the performance, how quick the solution is, and how easy it is to create a query."
"The solution provides information about the risk factors."
"It provides in-depth information on business activities once we log into the system."
"It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."
"In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating."
"We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"The ESM use cases are the most valuable. It enables us to use the big data collection inside our company. We are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution."
"I think the QDI is very good."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It is a very good SIEM."
"The product can scale."
"Vulnerability detection is the most valuable feature. It's the tool that finds the threats."
"There are other third-party plugins that we can use."
"On the back-end, Watson helps me figure out an exact problem, sometimes giving me the result."
"It protect us from multiple authentication values, unauthorized access and antivirus threats."
"ArcSight has been sold two or three times, and the quality has decreased."
"The next release should have AI capabilities."
"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."
"We find that the search and access functionality is quite slow."
"The solution could be improved in maintenance settings."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex."
"The integration with other systems could be improved."
"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."
"Do your research before implementing it, because it is tough to implement."
"The whole process for support is something that needs to be improved."
"We need more features in order to create rules to detect or to meet some requirements for other areas, for example, catching the event from other authentication tools."
"IBM technical support is always terrible."
"The dashboard and reports are not user-friendly or efficient so are of little help with threat hunting activity."
"There needs to be better integration with other applications."
"Before we didn't have any security issues but recently a few of the user emails were hacked. We had to actually recreate their emails for them."
"The only problem is that if you have too many events that occur, then the storage capacity becomes a problem. We would need to increase the storage capacity."
ArcSight Logger is ranked 28th in Log Management with 31 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Elastic Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and VMware Aria Operations for Logs, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Cortex XSIAM. See our ArcSight Logger vs. IBM Security QRadar report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.