user reviews of
Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud & Tricentis NeoLoad

Updated JANUARY 2022

Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you. Would you like to learn about products from people using them now?

Download our FREE report comparing Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and Tricentis NeoLoad based on reviews, features, and more!

...and 20 more!

Where should we email your report?

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud review

Michael Daniel
Michael Daniel
Sr. Technical Test Analyst at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees
Enabled us to eliminate load generators, and automatically triggers and produces...
When it comes to the CI pipeline, there were some limitations initially, but the latest version of LoadRunner is very helpful. They can integrate into the CI/CD pipeline. We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around...
Tricentis NeoLoad review

Patrik Badkar
Patrik Badkar
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts
LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more...

Since 2012, we've had 564,143 professionals use our research.

As seen in