user reviews of
Apache JMeter & Tricentis NeoLoad

Updated JANUARY 2022

Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you. Would you like to learn about products from people using them now?

Download our FREE report comparing Apache JMeter and Tricentis NeoLoad based on reviews, features, and more!

...and 20 more!

Where should we email your report?






Apache JMeter review

RajaRao
RajaRao
Associate at Tech Mahindra Limited
Easy to learn, and free to use but could be more user-friendly
We're like the solution to be more user-friendly. As freeware, not everything is readily available. You can't play around with everything. That's just due to the fact that it's not a paid tool. When you pay for tools, you get a bit more. Not everything is supported by JMeter. It's limited. With JMeter, with banking encryption, we have...
Tricentis NeoLoad review

Patrik Badkar
Patrik Badkar
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts
LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more...

Since 2012, we've had 564,143 professionals use our research.

As seen in