user reviews of
Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise & Tricentis NeoLoad

Updated JANUARY 2022

Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you. Would you like to learn about products from people using them now?

Download our FREE report comparing Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise and Tricentis NeoLoad based on reviews, features, and more!

...and 20 more!

Where should we email your report?






Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise review

NIKHIL_JAIN
NIKHIL_JAIN
Performance Test Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Full geographical coverage, integrates well with monitoring tools, granular...
Something that is missing is a platform where I can share practices with my team. I would like to be able to inform my team members of specific best practices, but at this point, I can only share scripts and stuff like that with them. Having a private community for my own team, where I can share information about best practices and skills,...
Tricentis NeoLoad review

Patrik Badkar
Patrik Badkar
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts
LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more...

Since 2012, we've had 564,143 professionals use our research.

As seen in