User Reviews of HyperScience & IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Updated September 2025

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing HyperScience and IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






HyperScience review

Satender Sajwan
Satender Sajwan
Operations Manager at Genpact
Gave a better output every time, reduced our touch time by 80%, and had a robust...
We tested HyperScience on structured formats of the forms, and it worked really well. We tested it with semi-structured formats, and it worked well. We also tested creating a new form that does not have any format. HyperScience has less capability while working on unstructured forms. Unstructured forms are those where there is no standard...
IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) review

Saman Guruge
Saman Guruge
Senior Engineer at MIT ESP
We can connect to different databases and use inbuilt activities, but we can't...
We can use its inbuilt activities, and it's a complete package, but just like ElectroNeek, a limitation is that we have to depend on its inbuilt activities. We can't include our own activities or we can't introduce other activities. When it comes to deployment and scheduling bots, there are some conflicts. They are using Microsoft MQ to...

Since 2012, we've had 872,869 professionals use our research.

As seen in