User Reviews of HyperScience & IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing HyperScience and IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






HyperScience review

Abdul Quadir
Abdul Quadir
Assistant Manager at WNS Global Services
It has a lot of functionality, whatever we use, but a few things could be improved
Extracting tables from certain documents could be improved. The next product release should include a utility that provides HyperScience JSON output. It would be related to any application, like other platforms and include Power Apps. We need to impact their REST API, but we would need a connection bridge application. And the second feature...
IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) review

Saman Guruge
Saman Guruge
Senior Engineer at MIT ESP
We can connect to different databases and use inbuilt activities, but we can't...
We can use its inbuilt activities, and it's a complete package, but just like ElectroNeek, a limitation is that we have to depend on its inbuilt activities. We can't include our own activities or we can't introduce other activities. When it comes to deployment and scheduling bots, there are some conflicts. They are using Microsoft MQ to...

Since 2012, we've had 768,857 professionals use our research.

As seen in