User Reviews of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) & Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Updated September 2025

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) review

Nasseer Qureshi
Nasseer Qureshi
Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group
Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies....
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks review

Ángel García Favieres
Ángel García Favieres
CyberSecurity Specialist at Aiuken Cybersecurity
Experience seamless networking with reliable support and enhanced security
It is all about the interface. The Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks interface is more difficult than FortiGate. The area where we encountered most problems was the permissions system. When the client wanted to give me access, they did not want to give me super admin access because they wanted me to have access only for specific tasks. We...

Since 2012, we've had 867,676 professionals use our research.

As seen in