User Reviews of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) & Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
Updated October 2025
Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.
Download our FREE report comparing Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks based on reviews, features, and more!
Where should we email your report?
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) review
Nasseer Qureshi
Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group
Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies....
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks review
Roberto Pastorino
Network and Cybersecurity Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Have supported client adoption of security solutions but need more control over...
It's a working solution. It's not the easiest, but no DLP solution is easy. With Netskope, the whole infrastructure is proprietary. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is using a service in AWS, and it's not totally a proprietary infrastructure. Sometimes a third-party outage could impact the whole operability. I'm not certain if the vendor...
Since 2012, we've had 872,706 professionals use our research.
As seen in