User Reviews of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) & Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Updated June 2025

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) review

Nasseer Qureshi
Nasseer Qureshi
Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group
Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies....
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks review

TodorShuev
TodorShuev
System Administrator at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Provides secure access and comes with flexible licensing and a single console
The user interface could be better. They need to work a little bit on the console. It is similar to their firewalls but not exactly. They need to clean it up a bit. Prisma Access' ADEM is good when it comes to segment-wise insights across the entire service delivery path. The only minus is that it is not supporting Linux. It is only for...

Since 2012, we've had 860,632 professionals use our research.

As seen in