User Reviews of Ixia BreakingPoint & OWASP Zap
Updated March 2024
Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.
Download our FREE report comparing Ixia BreakingPoint and OWASP Zap based on reviews, features, and more!
Where should we email your report?
Ixia BreakingPoint review
SDWAN Architect at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
Enables us to generate traffic but the quality of the traffic generation should...
The quality of the traffic generation could be improved, to get closer to being accurate in what a real user would do. There are some slight things to improve such as SNI (Server Name Indication) in traffic generator: the behaviors of the generated applications is not 100% accurate. We are working closely with the lab and with their support...
OWASP Zap review
FA9
Researcher in Cyber Security at Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Statistik BPS
Offers automated scanning feature and spidering capabilities have improved our...
There is the point that there may be false positives if we're doing vulnerability scanning. The automated scanning feature is good. But if the website has a web application firewall, it's very difficult to use automated scanning. Because the automated scan sends many requests at the same time, and the WAF will block it as suspicious...
Since 2012, we've had 768,246 professionals use our research.
As seen in