User Reviews of Azure Monitor & Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Updated July 2025

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing Azure Monitor and Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






Azure Monitor review

Muhammad Usman Khawar
Muhammad Usman Khawar
Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC
Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements...
The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks....
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance review

Sylvain Germe
Sylvain Germe
Application and Network Performance Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Highly scalable, responsive support, but lacking new features
This solution is geared towards on-premise setups, and would not be useful if the company plans to move to the cloud within the next two years, such as Google Cloud for example. If the goal is to monitor bandwidth at remote sites and identify performance issues because the network is under the control, this solution is useful. However, if a...

Since 2012, we've had 861,170 professionals use our research.

As seen in