User Reviews of IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe & NetApp NVMe AFF A800

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe and NetApp NVMe AFF A800 based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe review

Foluso  Jibowo
Foluso Jibowo
Product Manager at Hiperdist Ltd
A highly scalable solution requiring an easy setup while also offering its users a...
I would tell those planning to use the solution in the future that since many people would not be able to purchase IBM FlashSystem 9100. It is better to purchase IBM FlashSystem 9500. I also recommend other organizations embrace IBM FlashSystem as it is one of the best solutions in the market in terms of cost, performance, reliability,...
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 review

reviewer2081640
Programmer Analyst at a university with 10,001+ employees
Very easy to manage, highly stable and offers robustness of the CLI, API, and GUI
Cost and speed are the biggest concerns. NetApp systems they're not slow, but they don't match the raw IOPs of some other parallel file systems design. The underlying architecture of the NetApp system isn't as conducive to pure raw speed, whether it's data I/O or metadata I/O, compared to some of their competitors. So that's a significant...

Since 2012, we've had 765,234 professionals use our research.

As seen in