User Reviews of IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe & NetApp NVMe AFF A800

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe and NetApp NVMe AFF A800 based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






Verify your phone number
Didn't receive your code? Resend
IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe review
Mohamed_Hassan
Mohamed_Hassan
IT manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Offers high-speed data processing and more durable because of the high speed of...
It's a good system, but some vendors limit specific models from being upgraded to larger capacities. This forces us to migrate to a different model just for additional storage. So there are limitations in scaling the capacity within the same model. Therefore, integration with third-party vendors' products could be better. Another point is...
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 review
reviewer2081640
Programmer Analyst at a university with 10,001+ employees
Very easy to manage, highly stable and offers robustness of the CLI, API, and GUI
Cost and speed are the biggest concerns. NetApp systems they're not slow, but they don't match the raw IOPs of some other parallel file systems design. The underlying architecture of the NetApp system isn't as conducive to pure raw speed, whether it's data I/O or metadata I/O, compared to some of their competitors. So that's a significant...

Since 2012, we've had 767,847 professionals use our research.

As seen in