Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.
Download our FREE report comparing Ranorex Studio and Selenium HQ based on reviews, features, and more!
Where should we email your report?
Ranorex Studio review
Aws V
IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco
Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the...
There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object...
Selenium HQ review
Sujata Sujata Ghadage
Sr Manager consultant - Digital assurance Services at adrosonic
Automation in testing processes sees improvement with multi-browser support and...
Selenium HQ could improve by including a robust reporting framework, eliminating the need for external frameworks. The tool could simplify object identification, enabling users to generate XPaths without requiring detailed DOM understanding. Additionally, an automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the...
Since 2012, we've had 850,760 professionals use our research.