User Reviews of Parasoft SOAtest & Selenium HQ
Updated April 2025
Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.
Download our FREE report comparing Parasoft SOAtest and Selenium HQ based on reviews, features, and more!
Where should we email your report?
Parasoft SOAtest review
Ajit Kumar Rout
Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial
Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved
In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and...
Selenium HQ review
Sujata Sujata Ghadage
Sr Manager consultant - Digital assurance Services at adrosonic
Automation in testing processes sees improvement with multi-browser support and...
Selenium HQ could improve by including a robust reporting framework, eliminating the need for external frameworks. The tool could simplify object identification, enabling users to generate XPaths without requiring detailed DOM understanding. Additionally, an automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the...
Since 2012, we've had 852,649 professionals use our research.
As seen in