We performed a comparison between Trellix Network Detection and Response and VMRay based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)."Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly effective in mitigating these threats."
"We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up."
"The server appliance is good."
"The solution can scale."
"The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money."
"The MVX Engine seems to be very capable against threats and the way it handles APTs is impressive."
"The most valuable feature is the network security module."
"The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks."
"IP tracing is the most valuable feature."
"Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement."
"Improvements could be achieved through greater integration capabilities with different firewall solutions. Integrating with the dashboard itself for different firewalls so users can also pull tags into their firewall dashboard."
"The problem with FireEye is that they don't allow VM or sandbox customization. The user doesn't have control of the VMs that are inside the box. It comes from the vendor as-is. Some users like to have control of it. Like what type of Windows and what type of applications and they have zero control over this."
"As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web)."
"I would love to see better reporting. Because you can't export some of the reports in proper formats, it is hard to extract the data from reports."
"The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit."
"A better depth of view, being able to see deeper into the management process, is what I'd like to see."
"Technical support could be improved."
"The technical support needs improvement."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 37 reviews while VMRay is ranked 27th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 1 review. Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.4, while VMRay is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMRay writes "Has a valuable IP tracing feature, but is an expensive solution". Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiGate and Vectra AI, whereas VMRay is most compared with Cuckoo Sandbox, Joe Sandbox Ultimate, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiSandbox and VirusTotal.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
