We performed a comparison between Snare and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have security value."
"Snare has good agents, especially for Windows."
"The best thing about Snare is its format and consistency."
"The technical support is among the best in the market."
"We have a one stop dashboard for health of some of our services where you can click in and it takes you to other dashboards that have custom near real-time metrics that show the application's health."
"The most valuable features of Splunk Enterprise Security are its high-performance data collection, flexible query language, and its versatility across the organization."
"It gives me notifications of notable events."
"Splunk UBA is useful for fraud detection and for detection of APTs, advanced persistent threats."
"The flexibility of the solution is quite good."
"Its compatibility with other SIEMS is very useful."
"From the class that I took this week, being able to create notable events from whatever you find in the data set is pretty useful."
"Snare should modernize its GUI a little bit."
"The solution is now developing a SIEM-like feature on Snare Central Server, but it's not complete yet."
"Users will initially find it difficult to identify the event types and installation in Snare."
"The threat detection system has room for improvement."
"We'd like to have the number of devices covered under the license to be increased."
"Sometimes, the data does not match what we're looking for, or the tool contains incorrect data."
"The product's price may be an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Its search or filtering capability is nice, but it can be improved. It is currently a bit complicated, and it should be simplified. If we can write the search filter in a more simplified way, it would be better."
"The difficult part is related to integration with sources of data that are used to create the logs as this depends on the infrastructure of the client."
"The price of the solution could be cheaper."
"It works as intended for us, and we are getting everything that we need out of it. If anything, its initial setup can be improved a bit."
Snare is ranked 37th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 3 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 244 reviews. Snare is rated 8.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Snare writes "A highly scalable solution that is easy to manage and super easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Snare is most compared with syslog-ng, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, LogRhythm SIEM, ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) and Elastic Security, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel. See our Snare vs. Splunk Enterprise Security report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
