We performed a comparison between Skyhigh Security and Tenable.sc based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Tenable.sc excels in vulnerability detection, prioritization, and automation accuracy. On the other hand, Skyhigh Security boasts strong URL spam filtering, endpoint protection, and efficient backup features. While Skyhigh lacks SD-WAN, it is a market leader with good technical support and pricing. Tenable.sc has room for improvement in penetration testing, pricing, GUI, reporting, and support accuracy. Meanwhile, Skyhigh Security has deficiencies in support for unsanctioned apps, API integration, pricing, UI, reporting, and backup processes.
Service and Support: Tenable.sc's customer service is uncomplicated with varying satisfaction levels in response times and quality depending on the region. Skyhigh Security's support quality is dependent on the technician and subscription plan with mixed reviews on response times.
Ease of Deployment: Tenable.sc has a straightforward and easy initial setup that can be completed in a day, while Skyhigh Security's setup varies in difficulty and can take anywhere from five minutes to two weeks. Tenable.sc's setup is positively rated, while Skyhigh Security's setup is a mix of straightforward and complex.
Pricing: Tenable.sc charges based on IP addresses and extra fees for support, with differing opinions on pricing. Skyhigh Security has mixed reviews on pricing and licensing, with some finding it expensive and others reasonable, but the hardware is noted as pricey.
ROI: Tenable.sc promises to decrease personnel expenses and ensure a favorable ROI, while Skyhigh Security enhances security measures, reduces the likelihood of data breaches, and improves reputation.
Comparison Results: Tenable.sc is the preferred choice over Skyhigh Security based on the advanced features it offers, including compliance and vulnerability scans, accurate detection, and a risk-based approach. It also provides quick and precise updates, fewer false positives, and more accurate reports.
"The most valuable features of McAfee Web Gateway are anti-malware, reports, and powerful categorization of web pages."
"In terms of their compatibility with major cloud providers, in terms of their abilities, capabilities, and features, they exceed everyone's capabilities in the CASB market."
"It also prevents you from writing data to your Gmail and does not allow you to move your data outside of the corporate system. That is the most important feature for me."
"All the information available on each service, including its risk assessment."
"Without Skyhigh, we had zero visibility, but now we are aware of so much more."
"The feature I found most valuable is the API."
"I found the solution to be stable."
"The management is very good."
"The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are the reports and the dashboards."
"The solution is very intuitive and the dashboards are simple to use."
"This product has the best results in terms of the lowest number of false-positives and false-negatives."
"Tenable SC's most valuable features are the low number of false positives and the strong capability of providing prioritization for the vulnerabilities detected."
"Feature-wise, Tenable Security Center is a very fast tool with many dashboards and reports, and it covers all our systems."
"It is a very good and user-friendly product."
"It's a very useful tool."
"The virtual solution requires improvement."
"I would like to see more power being given to the admin. In the sense that in case an employee is facing an issue and they want to configure a service, like attaching an email in Gmail, for example, they should be given the option to make the service request and get that configured on the go."
"Iron out the few bugs that I've seen."
"They could be integrated with CASB. I think normally McAfee has this solution in the cloud, but for us the best is on-premise."
"Support for securing more cloud apps."
"I think that the User Interface could be improved."
"McAfee needs to add more products that could be managed from the cloud."
"The secure gateway could be improved."
"Tenable SC can improve by adding more integrations with HCI-type tools and more accurate vulnerability detection."
"The tool's initial configuration is not so easy."
"A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."
"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."
"The solution's user interface has some issues."
"Tenable SC can improve by making it easier to create complicated reports and have more effectiveness in the remediation area for comparison between the scans."
"If I want to have a very low-managed scan policy, it's a lot of work to create something which is very basic. If I use a tool like Nmap, all I have to do is download it, install it, type in the command, and it's good to go. In Security Center, I have to go through a lot of work to create a policy that's very basic."
"There's a lot of information being streamed out of the reports. What would be nice, and maybe we just haven't found it, would be more of an executive-type view. We still expect it to collect all this information, but we would like a feature that would allow us to show it to an executive or a director or someone like that and give them some type of high-level overview but not get into the nitty-gritty."
Skyhigh Security is ranked 14th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 51 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 10th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 48 reviews. Skyhigh Security is rated 8.4, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Skyhigh Security writes "Good scalability, but the technical support service needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Skyhigh Security is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Netskope , Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Symantec Proxy and Zscaler CASB, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai. See our Skyhigh Security vs. Tenable Security Center report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
