We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and SUSE NeuVector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects."
"I did a lot of research before signing up and doing the demo. They have a good reputation as far as catching threats early on."
"They're responsive to feature requests. If I suggest a feature for Prisma, I will need to wait until the next release on their roadmap. Cloud Native Security will add it right away."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"The offensive security where they do a fix is valuable. They go to a misconfiguration and provide detailed alerts on what could be there. They also provide a remediation feature where if we give the permission, they can also go and fix the issue."
"I like CSPM the most. It captures a lot of alerts within a short period of time. When an alert gets triggered on the cloud, it throws an alert within half an hour, which is very reasonable. It is a plus point for us."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"PingSafe is an excellent CSPM tool, but the CWPP features need to improve, and there is a scope for more application security posture management features. There aren't many ASPM solutions on the market, and existing ones are costly. I would like to see PingSafe develop into a single pane of glass for ASPM, CSPM, and CWPP. Another feature I'd like to see is runtime protection."
"One area for improvement could be the internal analysis process, specifically the guidance provided for remediation."
"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"PingSafe's current documentation could be improved to better assist customers during the cluster onboarding process."
"PingSafe can be improved by developing a comprehensive set of features that allow for automated workflows."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Container Security with 67 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is rated 8.6, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security, AWS GuardDuty and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Sysdig Falco, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure. See our SUSE NeuVector vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
