We performed a comparison between SAP Master Data Governance and TIBCO EBX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A good solution for large enterprises."
"Validates all aspects from security to authorization and authentication."
"The product is easy to use and is beneficial from a data governance perspective."
"SAP Master Data Governance integrates well."
"The most valuable thing is what it does: data management."
"The solution is great at standardizing all of our records."
"SAP Master Data Governance is a customizable solution and is flexible."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of SAP Master Data Governance is very easy."
"The tool's UI is good and easy to understand."
"There are a lot of possible use cases for this Master Data Management tool."
"The API and the data model are very valuable features."
"The product is extremely flexible."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are that is a complete tool and everything can be done inside, including data governance. We are able to model everything according to the needs of the company. If the company needs five people to agree to a change in data, they can do it with TIBCO EBX. They can model it with any particular rules. Additionally, there is dynamic data modeling, simple workflows using the GUI that comes from the server."
"The data quality is very good."
"The data modeling is very good."
"The initial setup is easy and straightforward."
"In general, I want artificial intelligence added to SAP Master Data Governance since I feel it is one of the areas where the solution has certain shortcomings."
"The price can be improved."
"They should improve the solution's performance as sometimes the process consumes much time."
"Lacks some features that are available in other solutions."
"The UI could improve by being more neat and clean. Sometimes users find it difficult to use it."
"The user experience can be improved."
"The implementation could be easier."
"The solution lacks some flexibility."
"The initial setup can be a bit complex."
"We would like to see the community an documentation for this solution be developed. At present there is very little tutorial documentation available, and limited community support for issues with the product."
"TIBCO EBX could improve by making the building of rules less complex and the repository is not robust."
"The tool has to improve mapping and workflow. It should be made more robust."
"In terms of improvements that this solution needs, it should support big data."
"The support isn't great and takes too long. And the pricing can be improved."
"Currently, users can't use Plain SQL queries in TIBCO EBX."
"The product does not scale well horizontally. We find the scalability to be quite inferior to other options."
SAP Master Data Governance is ranked 1st in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 22 reviews while TIBCO EBX is ranked 3rd in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 14 reviews. SAP Master Data Governance is rated 7.8, while TIBCO EBX is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP Master Data Governance writes "Provides efficient technical support services, but it could be more affordable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO EBX writes "Good workflow models and pull-down lists with very good data modeling". SAP Master Data Governance is most compared with Informatica MDM, Microsoft MDS, Reltio Cloud, IBM InfoSphere MDM and Semarchy xDM, whereas TIBCO EBX is most compared with Informatica MDM, Reltio Cloud, Stibo STEP MDM, Semarchy xDM and Microsoft MDS. See our SAP Master Data Governance vs. TIBCO EBX report.
See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.
We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
