Rapid7 AppSpider vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Rapid7 Logo
1,295 views|953 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tenable Logo
3,514 views|2,721 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Rapid7 AppSpider and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Andrei Bigdan
Jahanzeb Feroze Khan
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I would say that it is stable, as I am not aware of any major issues.""The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all the reports exactly what we want in a flexible way.""What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions.""The setup is usually straightforward.""It scans all the components developed within a web application.""AppSpider's most valuable feature is reporting - everything is stored in the local database so it can be sent to other machines.""It is really accurate and the rate of false positives is very low.""The most valuable feature is the reporting, which is compliant with international standards."

More Rapid7 AppSpider Pros →

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is very easy to use.""The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.""We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities.""The initial setup is straightforward.""The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful.""It is fully automated.""We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities.""It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Pros →

Cons
"AppSpider could improve in the area of integration. They need to add more integration opportunities.""AppSpider has some problems with the RAM needed while scanning.""One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions.""Support response times are slow and can be improved.""The solution is too slow. It could take a full day to scan. Competitors are much faster.""This price of this solution is a little bit expensive.""Implementing Rapid7 AppSpider requires scanning and self-identification mechanisms. You can add different types of authentication to each scan.""Integration could be better."

More Rapid7 AppSpider Cons →

"The platform's technical support services could be better.""They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap.""I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail.""It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable.""The report customization needs to be better.""The reporting has a very limited customization capability.""It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly.""The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."
  • "The price is pretty fair."
  • "The licensing cost depends on the number of users."
  • "AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."
  • "The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."
  • More Rapid7 AppSpider Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is okay."
  • "It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."
  • "Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."
  • "The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."
  • "I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."
  • More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all… more »
    Top Answer:The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor. The price of the… more »
    Top Answer:The performance of the solution could improve. When I compare the speed it is slower than others on the market. There are some tricks we use to help speed up the solution.
    Top Answer:The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.
    Top Answer:The platform's technical support services could be better.
    Top Answer:Implementing Tenable.io Web Application Scanning has been beneficial in identifying numerous vulnerabilities within application code. I rate its scanning capabilities in terms of user-friendliness an… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,295
    Comparisons
    953
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    429
    Rating
    7.3
    Views
    3,514
    Comparisons
    2,721
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    322
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AppSpider
    Learn More
    Overview

    SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

    Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

    Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

    Sample Customers
    Microsoft
    IMDEX
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government9%
    Healthcare Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Security Firm17%
    Educational Organization17%
    University8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business77%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Rapid7 AppSpider is ranked 25th in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 13 reviews while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is ranked 24th in Application Security Tools with 14 reviews. Rapid7 AppSpider is rated 7.8, while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Rapid7 AppSpider writes "Useful vulnerability reporting data, flexible, and simple implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning writes "Highly Recommended Solution with Latest Scanning Methods". Rapid7 AppSpider is most compared with Rapid7 InsightAppSec, OWASP Zap, Acunetix, Invicti and HCL AppScan, whereas Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is most compared with Acunetix, Qualys Web Application Scanning, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Fortify on Demand and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM).

    We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.