We performed a comparison between Quantum ActiveScale and Red Hat Ceph Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two File and Object Storage solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Workflow is easy to manage and maintain."
"The technology is stable which is good."
"The community support is very good."
"Most of the features are beneficial and one does not stand out above the rest."
"The solution is pretty stable."
"Ceph was chosen to maintain exact performance and capacity characteristics for customer cloud."
"The ability to provide block storage and object storage from the same storage cluster is very valuable for us."
"Red Hat Ceph Storage is a reliable solution, it works well."
"Most valuable features include replication and compression."
"It's a very performance-intensive, brilliant storage system, and I always recommend it to customers based on its benefits, performance, and scalability."
"We would like to see a self-sufficient installation."
"Lacks some ability to integrate with different systems."
"It takes some time to re-balance the storage in case of server failure."
"If you use for any other solution like other Kubernetes solutions, it's not very suitable."
"Rebalancing and recovery are a bit slow."
"The storage capacity of the solution can be improved."
"It would be nice to have a notification feature whenever an important action is completed."
"Some documentation is very hard to find."
"I would like to see better performance and stability when Ceph is in recovery."
"It needs a better UI for easier installation and management."
Earn 20 points
Quantum ActiveScale is ranked 20th in File and Object Storage while Red Hat Ceph Storage is ranked 3rd in File and Object Storage with 22 reviews. Quantum ActiveScale is rated 7.6, while Red Hat Ceph Storage is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Quantum ActiveScale writes "Good performance and reliable but the setup is complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Ceph Storage writes "Provides block storage and object storage from the same storage cluster". Quantum ActiveScale is most compared with Dell ECS, Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Qumulo and MinIO, whereas Red Hat Ceph Storage is most compared with MinIO, VMware vSAN, Portworx Enterprise, Pure Storage FlashBlade and NetApp StorageGRID. See our Quantum ActiveScale vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage report.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
