We performed a comparison between Power Admin PA File Sight and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The customers who have the use case of monitoring the file server and want to know the user's activity. It's the Power Admin's requirement."
"Integration with the cloud is pretty important and good for us. We found the integration with a lot of tools, not all tools yet, valuable. It does make the transfer of data, log files, and other things easier for us."
"The ability to rapidly diagnose problems in production and non-production, across hundreds of log files, is the most valuable feature."
"I like Splunk's data aggregation and search capabilities."
"The breadth of the data sources that Splunk can ingest data from is broad and deep and it does an exemplary job at handling structured data."
"Splunk has improved our operations by giving us access to more information and allowing us to deploy more use cases."
"It gives us the liberty to do more in terms of use cases."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"My favorite example of improving of organization is saving a $60k/mo in payroll fraud and $10k/mo in wasted API credits by using simple searches and clear reports."
"The setup takes half an hour. It will be a little complex."
"The cluster environment should be improved. We have a cluster. In the Splunk cluster environment, in the case of heavy searches and heavy load, the Splunk cluster goes down, and we have to put it in the maintenance mode to get it back. We are not able to find the actual culprit for this issue. I know that cluster has RF and SF, but it has been down so many times. There should be something in Splunk to help users to find the reason and the solution for such issues."
"Some of the search functions can be better. There has been a lot of talk at the conference about the update of SPL before each iteration. That will be a lot of help."
"Delays in responses from the technical team can pose challenges for both vendors and clients, especially considering that Splunk applications and machine solutions are critical assets."
"The product's price may be an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Splunk could enhance its services by providing more comprehensive professional assistance aimed at optimizing our investment."
"Splunk does not build apps. They only go back and validate the apps that somebody has already built. They should have remote consulting support. They have a wonderful solution. They have 24/7 security. Nobody needs to depend on any third party and will therefore just buy Splunk on the cloud."
"The GUI can be improved to include some of the capabilities that other BI solutions have."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
Power Admin PA File Sight is ranked 39th in Log Management with 1 review while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 244 reviews. Power Admin PA File Sight is rated 9.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Power Admin PA File Sight writes "Good stability and preferred choice for DLP needs over other solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Power Admin PA File Sight is most compared with , whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.