We performed a comparison between Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Pivotal Cloud Foundry is very easy to use compared to other cloud technologies. It has a very good performance."
"Stability is not a concern with this product."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and the deployment is easier."
"It is a scalable product...We are not facing any particular issues since most of the applications in our company are written in Java and .NET."
"The most valuable feature of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is auto-healing and the plenty of other features that are provided."
"The most valuable feature of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is the UI, it is easy to use."
"The solution is stable and resilient. In our company, we do not even see any challenges with the solution."
"It provides a set of developer-friendly tools that simplify application deployment."
"The HANA replications are very useful."
"Improved our speed to bring our mobile applications into productive use in a cost-effective way."
"Cloud Platform's stability is great."
"One of the most valuable features I have found is that the solution is secure."
"The pre-delivered content from the SAP cloud platform is definitely a strength."
"SAP has provided very good support."
"The dashboard provides pretty good clarity."
"The integration flows are the most valuable feature of this solution."
"There are no synthetic application monitoring and real-time monitoring features."
"The user interface should be simpler to navigate because it t can take time for users to learn it."
"Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve on the technology it is a bit complex."
"Pivotal Cloud Foundry doesn't have certain advanced features."
"Regarding the setup phase, every step is a hurdle. With Pivotal Cloud Foundry, I won't get any proper resources for that. Even if I Google it, there is no proper solution for Pivotal Cloud Foundry."
"I'd like to see a larger service offering."
"The Pivotal Cloud Foundry's initial setup has a learning curve for my team, but it was easy to use."
"There is a lot of uncertainty surrounding the future of Pivotal Cloud Foundry."
"SAP Cloud Platform's installation is not straightforward. You need a person with knowledge to handle it."
"The solution requires more flexibility overall."
"Usability is a challenge most of the time and not being able to get all of the information."
"What I would like to see improved is the learning curve."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The current pricing model is credit-based. We would like to have more information about the usage of the existing applications."
"I would like to see more and better support for data transformations."
"I'd like to see more local integration."
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is ranked 7th in PaaS Clouds with 15 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 6th in PaaS Clouds with 38 reviews. Pivotal Cloud Foundry is rated 7.6, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Pivotal Cloud Foundry writes "Easy to use, simple to sign-in, but lacking graphical interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Pivotal Cloud Foundry is most compared with OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and Talend Data integration. See our Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs. SAP Cloud Platform report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.