We performed a comparison between Oracle SOA Suite and WebLogic Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's XSLT or XSL Transformation feature was very useful."
"The most valuable feature of the facility, as the partner link, is to try to use third-party services and logic in your own vehicle to orchestrate the information."
"What I like best about Oracle SOA Suite is Oracle support. I also like the tool features, especially the integration feature."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle SOA Suite is all the platform's capabilities."
"In case there is something that doesn't work out of the box, you have the flexibility to customize it."
"The stability of the solution is the most valuable feature."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."
"Valuable features include connectors and BAM."
"Scalability on the solution is great. It's very very easy to scale."
"WebLogic Suite is scalable."
"What I've been seeing as the most valuable characteristics of WebLogic Suite include robustness and scalability. It's a really good solution, and I'm not saying this because my company is a partner of WebLogic Suite. I also like that with the newer versions of the solution, you can deploy WebLogic Suite faster. Oracle also provides excellent technical support."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"WebLogic adds a lot of value to business and investments."
"Robust solution; console and enterprise management tools are really easy to work."
"The solution is very scalable. It's easy to add processes even if you are new to the solution."
"The feature that I have found to be the most valuable is the ease of deployment."
"Various parts of SOA, BPEL, and so on, each have their own consoles which need to be accessed individually with different logins. It would be better from an admin perspective if all the consoles were accessible via a single login."
"The Maven integration in JDeveloper is very basic and might be enhanced to allow the proper use of Maven."
"An area for improvement in Oracle SOA Suite is the cost. It could be lower."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"I want to see easier integration connections with other cloud-based tools."
"The web services need to be more robust."
"Other solutions might be better componets such as Salesforce."
"It's also not developer-friendly."
"This solution doesn't have connectors to other external applications."
"The solution needs to share more information in terms of training. There needs to be more documentation involved to help those who are completely new to the product."
"The restart capability needs to be improved because it takes us 15 minutes to restart any application."
"I would like to see the licensing policy simplified."
"The support is not good."
"Sometimes there are issues when we work on a VM because people use it to put all of their reports on it at the same time. Then I have to restart and rebuild the machine."
"Lacking a solution for smaller applications."
"There are sometimes issues with clusters."
Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 65 reviews while WebLogic Suite is ranked 11th in Application Infrastructure with 31 reviews. Oracle SOA Suite is rated 8.0, while WebLogic Suite is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebLogic Suite writes "Simple setup, reliable, and performs well". Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with Mule ESB, Apache Web Server, TIBCO ActiveMatrix, Microsoft .NET Framework and IBM BPM, whereas WebLogic Suite is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, Microsoft .NET Framework, NGINX Plus and Apache Web Server. See our Oracle SOA Suite vs. WebLogic Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
