We performed a comparison between Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Operations Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is mapping."
"The IT analysis provides the best solution as to how the infrastructure is going."
"The solution provides different types of logs like audit, service, and API logs."
"It has reduced the time to resolution, time to investigate, and time to troubleshoot for debugging issues."
"The tool helps with advanced reports and keeps the system scalable and flexible. It provides a clear picture of the current status of any incidents. As a CISO, I see a lot of potential for future innovation, which is interesting. I've noticed better performance, especially with the reports."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk Enterprise Security is the comprehensive logging capabilities it provides."
"It is very scalable."
"The most useful feature for me is the ability to create different kinds of alerts and set a different kind of denominator that will capture the real event. That is helpful for a power user like me."
"The additional vendors we've brought on board, particularly the elastic, have been quite beneficial."
"Recently, Splunk upgraded to version 9.0.02, which includes excellent data dashboards and visualization effects."
"You can use it to gather syslog messages from anything."
"The logs in the solution are dispersed in different layers, so we have to pick the logs from different areas."
"The pricing could be improved."
"Reporting is sometimes a little slow."
"The product's price may be an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution could improve by increasing the performance. We have run into problems when large amounts of data are processed."
"The UI could be better. This is applicable to Splunk in general. I know that a lot of people who get their hands on Splunk are hesitant to use it just because they find it overwhelming. There are a lot of options."
"Splunk could improve its default machine-learning models. Also, Splunk Enterprise's native threat intelligence isn't that good. I prefer a custom threat intelligence model."
"It would be nice if Splunk reduced the cost of training. Their training sessions are way too costly."
"It's difficult to set up initially, and their billing model is also a bit complicated."
"Adding custom visualization in Splunk has been improved over the years but can still be made better by integrating more and more JavaScript visualization sources."
"Its pricing is extremely high. There are other tools out in the market that are competitive. They do not necessarily have all the functionality, but they are competitive. The professional services we have used have been high as well in comparison to the market."
More Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service is ranked 9th in IT Operations Analytics with 3 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in IT Operations Analytics with 240 reviews. Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service is rated 7.4, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service writes "Low-maintenance with great mapping features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service is most compared with , whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel. See our Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service vs. Splunk Enterprise Security report.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.
We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.