We performed a comparison between Oracle Application Development Framework and Spring MVC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best part of Oracle ADF is being able to easily write code in Java with JavaBean files."
"The most valuable feature of the Oracle Application Development Framework is the rapid development and the security it provides."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the business components."
"It's database-centric, and it's seemingly easy to use the model–view–controller pattern that's built-in."
"The single sign-on features applied to Oracle Cloud is a valuable feature. All parts of this application are compatible with single sign-on, where you have a security feature that is very good in Oracle Cloud."
"There are several valuable features. First is the fast deployment. Also the ease of use."
"The power of Oracle ADF is in the business components."
"We can create objects that allow us to develop pages and applications very rapidly."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
"Spring has a speedy development process with a lightweight framework."
"Dependency Injection is one of the major features which makes our life easier using Spring. It is well documented and has active communities, which provide us enormous help."
"Spring MVC's extensive documentation is the most valuable feature."
"We appreciate that this product is really easy to integrate with third-party UI services."
"The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities."
"We have found Spring is easy to use and learn."
"When we shifted from our legacy frameworks to the Spring framework, we discovered that Spring definitely made our development easier. One good example is that there is a lot of boiler plate code available that you don't have to write from scratch, making the development of web applications a much simpler process."
"Oracle Application Development Framework is set to go out of support over the next three years but they should provide support for the solution for the longer term. Additionally, there needs to be more overall optimization and specifically in webpage rendering. The solution uses a lot of resources, and in order for them to move forward, they would have to create a smaller resource impact."
"The performance of this solution needs to be improved because it is very slow."
"Lacks tailoring to geographic regional differences and consistent integration with third parties."
"The UI is very slow and not up to market standard."
"Oracle ADF needs more components and the layout can be improved."
"I use JDeveloper along with ADF and, unfortunately, JDeveloper is a very slow tool. It takes a lot of time to accomplish things with it during both development and deployment. I hope that Oracle will improve JDeveloper to make it run faster."
"The model layer could be improved for performance because once that part gets bloated, the performance is lacking. So, there is room for performance optimization."
"The application needs to be more lightweight and the performance improved."
"We would like the deployment of this solution to be easier as, at present, it is quite complicated."
"It could provide faster performance."
"The documentation for Spring MVC could improve."
"Spring MVC could improve the integration with DevOps and other applications."
"The newer versions of Spring MVC have released a lot of features that we are not using right now because, in many cases, we are limited to running older versions. As such, it would be nice if Spring were to improve support for upgrading to newer versions, especially for legacy applications."
"The solution could be simplified quite a bit. It's unnecessarily complicated in some areas."
"Adding more modules takes about 10 to 15 minutes each. It would be nice if they could reduce that part. The deployment time is a little high."
"It can be difficult for a basic user to understand the concepts in this solution, such as inversion of control."
More Oracle Application Development Framework Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Application Development Framework is ranked 8th in Java Frameworks with 9 reviews while Spring MVC is ranked 3rd in Java Frameworks with 16 reviews. Oracle Application Development Framework is rated 7.8, while Spring MVC is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Application Development Framework writes "Eases the writing of code in Java with JavaBeans; easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring MVC writes "Straightforward setup, highly stable, and useful online support". Oracle Application Development Framework is most compared with Spring Boot, Jakarta EE and Apache Spark, whereas Spring MVC is most compared with Jakarta EE, Spring Boot, Apache Spark, Open Liberty and Vert.x. See our Oracle Application Development Framework vs. Spring MVC report.
See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.
We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.