We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Professional and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."What we like the most is that it integrates with UC."
"The most valuable features of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional are scripting and executing the tests."
"The reporting mechanism is a valuable feature that generates good reports."
"I recommend LoadRunner Professional as it supports many protocols and applications and is very easy to set up and use."
"There are various languages that they allow those programs to be written in, whether you want to use Java or something else."
"My favorite feature in LoadRunner Professional is its ability to group scripts under separate IDs."
"LoadRunner Professional allowed us to load test potential new payroll solutions that would be implemented throughout the entire organization so that we knew which was best suited to performing well under pressure."
"Scaling is definitely one of the best features of this solution. There are no issues scaling to 10,000 or 20,000 concurrent users."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"The solution is very stable."
"One of the best documentation in the world."
"The whole suite is made for .NET development."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"I guess scalability becomes a problem when you use things like TruClients."
"Improvement wise, the pipeline should be enabled. It should be embedded as part of the tool itself rather than going with third-party tools. Monitoring should be more effective as well."
"The debugging capability should be improved."
"Sometimes we are not be able to click on some of the buttons due to the screen mismatching and compatibility issues."
"The price of this solution should be cheaper."
"If the support of the protocols was the same throughout the other protocols and it was there evenly, then I would rate the product higher."
"The solution lacks some form of integration."
"The reporting and GUI have room for improvement."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"Visual Studio Test Professional should include more automation."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
More OpenText LoadRunner Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText LoadRunner Professional is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 77 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. OpenText LoadRunner Professional is rated 8.4, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Professional writes "A sophisticated tool that supports many languages and works with all kinds of applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText LoadRunner Professional is most compared with Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter and IBM Rational Performance Tester, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT Developer.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.