We performed a comparison between Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) and VMware Cloud Foundation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution can scale well."
"The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters."
"The most valuable feature is having the full features of my Nutanix on-premises applications in the cloud."
"The scalability is good."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Clusters is to protect the data."
"Having a single pane of glass where you can have both your on-prem and anything else that you spin up within AWS is useful."
"I've been very pleased with their support overall."
"In terms of dealing with our business-critical workloads, Nutanix is a highly scalable, highly resilient, and very high-performing solution."
"The initial setup is straightforward and easy."
"I'm able to deploy many platforms like AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle, and Azure on VMware."
"The product enables flexibility in network structures."
"The mission aspect of the solution is the most valuable feature."
"Technical support is helpful."
"The solution is very stable."
"The stability is good."
"VMware Cloud Foundation makes it easy to set up new environments. You get hosts in a pool, which you can build into a new cluster."
"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."
"There are still some things that could be improved about the product."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"I'd like more flexible options to get in and out of migration modes."
"We've had some challenges with the implementation."
"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."
"The pricing can be better."
"Perhaps the one thing that could be improved is the documentation around the solution."
"We would like the ability to write to both sites at the same time, in a synchronous fashion."
"From a stability perspective, there may be some issues."
"In the early adoption of VMware Cloud Foundation, we have seen minor problems. For example, in our Federation, I see the single pane of glass where we need to manage everything, which is good. However, internally, we have a Kafka database that is distributed by the database used by the SDDC manager. During the distribution and synchronization, there is some issue and we need to stop the process."
"The documentation could be easier to read"
"They should provide integration with Azure VMware Solution."
"Life cycle management is an area for improvement."
"The interface is good, but there are compatibility issues or issues with the certificate for the VCenter."
"They need to offer more support for Mac."
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is ranked 5th in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 9 reviews while VMware Cloud Foundation is ranked 2nd in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 23 reviews. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is rated 8.6, while VMware Cloud Foundation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) writes "Helps manage costs, eliminates waste, and has excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Cloud Foundation writes "Offers automated deployment features that enhances operational efficiency and simplifying complex tasks ". Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is most compared with Azure Stack, AWS Outposts, VMware Cloud on AWS, Microsoft Azure and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas VMware Cloud Foundation is most compared with Azure Stack, AWS Outposts, Google Anthos and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). See our Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs. VMware Cloud Foundation report.
See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors and best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
