We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Tanium XEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)."Compliance and the policies that can be set are the most valuable features."
"It's very informative when there is an error. It allows us to backtrace where the error is and resolve that ourselves. It's a bit of a Swiss Army penknife. We find that it fixes most issues."
"If you need only to load a specific profile and you don't have deep security functionalities, et cetera, Intune is very nice and good."
"Intune's unified endpoint management platform is invaluable."
"The most valuable features in Microsoft Intune for me are application deployment, Defender deployment, and asset management."
"Easy to use."
"There has been a noticeable increase in productivity for both my organization and clients."
"It works pretty well for us."
"Its cross-platform capabilities and the ability to do both OS-level patching and third-party patching are valuable. It is difficult to find a software product that will do all that for you out of the box, and you don't have to do any configuration other than your initial setup. Once you do that, there is a very minimalistic approach to getting it operational. You can have it up and running within a 20-minute time span."
"The solution's most valuable features are its patch management capabilities, especially for third-party applications, along with quick and easy configuration and deployment processes."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The solution is time-saving and resource-saving."
"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine Endpoint Central is the central management console. Additionally, inventory tracking is helpful for knowing where our assets are."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Patch Management."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central automatically alerts you if there are newer releases or updates. You do not have to go to their website and check."
"The stability is very good."
"The solution's technical support is very responsive."
"I would like some integration with the Microsoft reporting platform Power BI."
"While Intune works perfectly well, the only potential downside is that the deployment could be a bit complex for some users."
"There should be more focus on mobile device security and integration."
"They need to integrate more with security options."
"Reporting and troubleshooting for the application deployment could be better. It's very difficult to understand."
"There can be delays in the deployment of new policies."
"The synchronization could be improved."
"They need to add more group policies. Intune currently does not have many group policies that you can deploy. Its reporting, which is very limited at the moment, also needs improvement. It will be great if they can add report customization. Its stability needs to be improved. Sometimes, when you register a device in Intune, it doesn't show up instantly on the engine portal on the admin side. They need to provide better support for complicated issues. They also have a long turnaround time."
"The performance sometimes lags a bit because the solution is demanding on system resources."
"Not many things are needed for improvement, everything seems to be great as it is. One thing that would be good to have would be the ability to add MDM to a tablet running Android 5.0 using the EMM Token Enrollment. If we wanted to add MDM to an older tablet, we just have to go the "long route" to get it added."
"Their support channel could be better. They're an India-based company. They're based out of India. So, here in the States, support can be difficult when you're dealing with time zone requirements. A more global support channel would be a wise choice for them."
"It is compatible with the systems such as Windows and Mac but not with Linux systems."
"Improvement of the chats on the web communication through the WAN would be helpful."
"The team I've currently got is not using it particularly well, due to the fact that they don't know how to use it particularly well. They've not done any training and so on."
"We are looking for a complete solution for patch management with central management and the cloud which ManageEngine Endpoint Central does not provide."
"We would like to see options for deploying Microsoft 365 accounts into Outlook. For now we only can use it to deploy exchange accounts. Also we would like to see an option do decline Windows 7 ESU patches in a bulk."
"There are some bugs in the product. The tool needs to improve in the area of reporting."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 3rd in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 59 reviews while Tanium XEM is ranked 13th in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 1 review. ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2, while Tanium XEM is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tanium XEM writes "Offers reliability and efficiency to users". ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Tanium XEM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Adaptiva and Ivanti Neurons for MDM.
See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.