We performed a comparison between Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Logsign SIEM are its cloud capabilities, alerting functionality, integration with Elastic Search, and configuration options."
"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."
"It has efficient SCA capabilities."
"It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection."
"Wazuh offers numerous features, such as the ability to define custom rules for detecting malicious activities and remembering behaviors."
"It's stable."
"I like that the solution is on top of the Kubernetes stack."
"The most valuable features are the modules and metrics."
"The tool is stable."
"Good for monitoring, active response, and for vulnerabilities."
"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."
"Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively."
"They could include flexibility and customization capabilities by modifying for customers based on partner agreements."
"The support team could be more responsive and provide quicker replies during our working hours in Indonesia, which would be a significant improvement."
"Alerts should be specific rather than repeatedly triggered by integrating multiple factors. This issue needs improvement to create a more efficient alert system."
"Wazuh needs more security and features, particularly visualization features and a health monitor."
"The computing resources are consuming and do not make sense."
"A more structured approach, perhaps with modular UI components, to facilitate easier integration and navigation within the Wazuh platform for custom integrations would be beneficial."
"The implementation is very complex."
"Wazuh doesn't cover sources of events as well as Splunk. You can integrate Splunk with many sources of events, but it's a painful process to take care of some sources of events with Wazuh."
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is ranked 44th in Log Management with 3 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 38 reviews. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is rated 7.6, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM writes "Easy to use and find the features that you need". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is most compared with Grafana Loki, IBM Security QRadar, Logpoint, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer and Sematext Logs, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Security, AlienVault OSSIM and Graylog. See our Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
