Kubernetes vs Rancher Labs comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Kubernetes Logo
7,387 views|4,804 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Rancher Labs Logo
7,703 views|6,110 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kubernetes and Rancher Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Kubernetes vs. Rancher Labs Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"If you're switching from VMs to Kubernetes, you will see a return because you can pack more into the Kubernetes architecture using containers rather than VMs. You'll see some more savings on your infrastructure, as well.""It is a very good solution for deploying microservices in an application. It has a lot of freedom in it, which makes it very interesting. It is also web-enabled. You can run services in other virtual applications and virtual machines.""The most valuable feature is the Zero Touch Operations, which involves a new way of performing operations and support. We do not have to do maintenance, the operations are very simple.""It's scalable.""Kubernetes' most valuable features include scalability and deployment.""The product is highly scalable.""The cloud-managed Kubernetes allow us to take care of a big system and deployment and container management without having a big operational team.""The scalability seems quite good."

More Kubernetes Pros →

"The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or the company, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations.""This solution is not vendor-locked, which means that we we are able to use it across all of our resources; this feature is of great value to us.""The product is simple to use for a beginner.""Rancher Labs is a very user-friendly tool.""A great UI with very good integrations.""The most valuable feature is its comprehensive support, easy resource scaling, compatibility with various OEMs, and seamless service integration.""The scalability potential is very good.""The solution is stable."

More Rancher Labs Pros →

Cons
"Honestly, there is not much I like about Kubernetes. It's very complicated to deal with. I just do it because I have to.""The management needs to be improved.""There is a feature called Terraform and, based on the reviews I have read, it could be improved.""I think that the GUI dashboard in Kubernetes is very simple and that there are no great options.""Kubernetes can improve pod escalation.""The solution could be more stable.""The virtual machines should be GUI-based""Kubernetes is a complex solution. The product needs to be more manageable and user-friendly."

More Kubernetes Cons →

"One area for improvement in Rancher Labs is the development aspect.""The solution could improve by adding more features in the dashboard, such as monitoring, scanning, and security. This would be a great benefit.""There needs to be an improvement in observability and microservice monitoring tools in Rancher Labs.""They should improve application visibility along with code visibility.""We're looking for something that is even easier to use. It's a bit complicated.""We have found that the auto-secure feature of this solution doesn't always work, and could be improved to be more reliable, particularly when working with business critical applications.""If you have poor infrastructure, you will have issues with the tool.""The biggest room for improvement in Rancher Labs would be to have a proper upgrading plan."

More Rancher Labs Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The management layer is free, which is perfect. You don't need to pay money for the management layer, but in AWS develop service, you need to pay. I think it is €75 per month for the management layer. It is free here, so you can have as many Kubernetes clusters as you need. You are paying just for the workload, that is, for the machine, CPU, memory, and everything."
  • "Kubernetes is open-source."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "Kubernetes is open source. But we have to manage Kubernetes as a team, and the overhead is a bit high. Compared with the platforms like Cloud Foundry, which has a much less operational overhead. Kubernetes, I have to manage the code, and I have to hire the developers. If someone has a product, a developer should know exactly what he's writing or high availability, and all those things may differ the costs."
  • "There are no licensing fees."
  • "There is no licensing fee."
  • "In addition to Kubernetes, you have to pay for support."
  • "The solution requires a license to use it."
  • More Kubernetes Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is an annual subscription. The price of the solution should be cheaper and have better pricing flexibility."
  • "The solution is free and open source but there is a fee for support."
  • "This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs involved."
  • "Although Rancher Labs is an open-source solution, they also offer a paid version, where you buy the support when needed."
  • "The pricing of the solution sits in the mid range, not high and not low. It has a fixed price that you pay every month."
  • "There are no hidden charges attached to the product unless a user opts for the premium support offered by the solution."
  • "The cost is reasonable since it's open source. Rancher effectively addresses container orchestration trends, especially for those with some Kubernetes knowledge."
  • More Rancher Labs Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There are many good features. I feel that the scale-out features, like replica sets, are very good. The number of running containers can be autoscaled.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive. It's a bit costlier for smaller organizations. It's good for bigger organizations, but for smaller organizations or a few… more »
    Top Answer:Kubernetes is open source, which is both beneficial and negative depending on the responsibilities. Supported versions like Red Hat, Amazon, Microsoft, or Google are pricey. It's good for bigger… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or the company, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations.
    Top Answer:There are no hidden charges attached to the product unless a user opts for the premium support offered by the solution.
    Top Answer:Rancher Labs is currently investing in Harvester, as it is an area where improvements are required. I think that in the future, it would be a very powerful tool to compete with giant competitors like… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    7,387
    Comparisons
    4,804
    Reviews
    38
    Average Words per Review
    494
    Rating
    8.7
    5th
    Views
    7,703
    Comparisons
    6,110
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    452
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    K8
    Learn More
    Overview

    Kubernetes (K8s) is an open-source system for automating deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications.
    It groups containers that make up an application into logical units for easy management and discovery. Kubernetes builds upon 15 years of experience of running production workloads at Google, combined with best-of-breed ideas and practices from the community.

    Rancher Labs build innovative, open source software that makes it easy to deploy and manage containers in production on any infrastructure. We enable organizations to accelerate all aspects of their software development pipeline, from writing and testing code to running complex microservices-based applications.

    Rancher, our flagship container management platform, allows users to easily manage all aspects of running containers in development and production environments, on any infrastructure. With well over four million downloads, Rancher has quickly become the tools of choice for teams serious about running containers in production. This includes large enterprises such as Sony, IBM, Tyco, Align Technologies and more.

    Sample Customers
    China unicom, NetEase Cloud, Nav, AppDirect
    Albert Heijn, Bell, BMC, Samsung, WindStream, Johnson & Johnson
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Retailer12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Pharma/Biotech Company14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Kubernetes vs. Rancher Labs
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Kubernetes vs. Rancher Labs and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kubernetes is ranked 4th in Container Management with 73 reviews while Rancher Labs is ranked 5th in Container Management with 14 reviews. Kubernetes is rated 8.6, while Rancher Labs is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Kubernetes writes "Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rancher Labs writes "An easy-to-use user interface, which makes it easy to work with Kubernetes and containers". Kubernetes is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon EKS, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Google Kubernetes Engine and HashiCorp Nomad, whereas Rancher Labs is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Docker, Amazon EKS and Robin Cloud Native Storage for Kubernetes. See our Kubernetes vs. Rancher Labs report.

    See our list of best Container Management vendors.

    We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.