We performed a comparison between Keysight Oscilloscopes and Tektronix Oscilloscopes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Siglent, Tektronix, Keysight Technologies and others in Oscilloscopes.
"I use the serial decoder for the serial interfaces, which helps me debug my product quickly."
"The user interface is very user-friendly. You can use a lot of functions in their scope and will provide them for you. You can update the scope's software by asking Keysight to update the software when you want."
"It's a one-stop solution. It does everything we need. The combined functionality is the biggest benefit."
"The customer support is very good. If you need an application to do any measurement, you can easily get a hold of people to help you with it. This is a whole ecosystem."
"It's easier to automate and connect with multiple devices, and at the same time with laptops."
"While it depends on the field, the learning curve is usually really quick."
"The user interface is simple and straightforward, so I can easily measure frequency, time, and other complex measurements."
"Its 4 port has true differential with quite a few de-embedding features. It goes up to 40 GHz with high performance."
"It takes 35 to 45 minutes to get acclimated to the solution."
"The user interface is good, not very complicated. It is very intuitive."
"The most valuable features are its ease of use, user interface, and PAM-4. The user interface is good and easy to use."
"It provides you the best way to view information without opening multiple applications, like a single solution."
"The Tektronix user interface is like an Apple iPhone, but for oscilloscopes. It is simple to use."
"I haven't seen anything similar where it has a spectrum analyzer and regular scope together."
"Tektronix is robust and reliable. It's a hammer-resistant machine, a fact which is most important on our manufacturing floor."
"The most valuable feature is the automation component in setting up some of these measurements."
"There is room for improvement with some of the features of the scope. I would like them to make it a bit more simplistic... For example, if I want to look at what the total jitter is, they should make it simpler to find that, with different tabs."
"I would like more customized functions, so we can do the programming and definitions ourselves. There is an automation flow to capture this signal, and we would like to do this ourselves."
"Some of the models have only two ports. It takes much longer to use a two-port. If they had a four-port, it would be much better."
"The integration between different software and hardware panels could be improved. In the software, it's not as strong as the other solutions."
"I would also like to see a more detailed change-notice from version to version, what changed. If they had a more detailed description of what is changing and the reason for it, rather than just releasing, that would be good for us so we know whether or not to upgrade."
"Every component has a manufacturing tolerance. I hope Keysight software can help with the tolerance loss in manufacturing variance, which can be ten percent or five percent. In the real world, we cannot fire a really perfect test with very smooth impedance. I would like to see Keysight provide a solution to solve the issue of loss of manufacturing variance."
"There is a learning curve depends on the client that I am working with. E.g., if I'm working with a client, and they have a test and measurement equipment company, when I go to another company, the new company may not be using the same model."
"Everybody is looking for more automation support, so that if they can incorporate more protocols. It makes it easier."
"I want the system to have a wider bandwidth because high-speed continues to move faster, so there is more bandwidth to cover."
"I would like if they could have more customer support engagement."
"It needs one button and every time you push it, you get whatever you need."
"I use microservices, but you cannot really probe it, since the technology is not really there."
"They need to add more memory to this machine."
"I would like to see an app from this company for test fixtures."
"On the source side, their AWGs don't have enough bandwidth. They need to increase the bandwidth of their AWGs, meaning they have to have a faster sample rate."
"There was a learning curve, which was a little tricky at times. Getting used to the GUI took time because we had to learn the different features."
Keysight Oscilloscopes is ranked 3rd in Oscilloscopes while Tektronix Oscilloscopes is ranked 2nd in Oscilloscopes. Keysight Oscilloscopes is rated 8.4, while Tektronix Oscilloscopes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Keysight Oscilloscopes writes "We are able to easily record and save our test setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tektronix Oscilloscopes writes "High sampling rate enables it to clearly render the envelope". Keysight Oscilloscopes is most compared with Siglent, RIGOL Oscilloscopes, Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes, Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes and Anritsu Oscilloscopes, whereas Tektronix Oscilloscopes is most compared with Siglent, Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes, Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes, RIGOL Oscilloscopes and Yokogawa Oscilloscopes.
See our list of best Oscilloscopes vendors.
We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
