• Home
  • iomete vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs iomete comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
iomete Logo
iomete
95 views|26 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Read 48 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews
26,458 views|12,884 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Data Governance
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between iomete and Microsoft Purview Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Governance Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use iomete?
Mohammad Kassab
Safeguards sensitive and confidential data, but frequent updates can make navigating the UI unpredictable
Microsoft is aiming to build favorable relationships with other cloud solution providers. On our end, if we have both AWS solutions and Microsoft's... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive."
  • "Microsoft Purview is the best option I have encountered when it comes to price. Maybe some of my information is outdated, but Microsoft offered it so that you could use it almost without paying."
  • "There is some competition out there, but the other solutions are quite expensive. They are enterprise tools that are a bit more mature but the license costs $100,000 for some of them. Purview is pay-per-use and a lot of companies are interested in that."
  • "Aside from the complexity of the pricing model, the price itself is realistic. Features like AI components and automatic classification require additional licenses. Still, anyone can start using Purview with a basic E3 license if they're using Microsoft 365 and grow with additional licenses as needed. Overall, we're satisfied with the price."
  • "Its pricing is good in terms of the features that they are providing, but there are many competitors in the market who can easily provide you with similar services at a lesser cost."
  • "The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."
  • "Price-wise, I think it's very generous and accessible to not just enterprises but small to medium-sized companies as well. I think it's very fair in terms of how they break apart the storage and the actual computing, and that makes it very accessible. So, that is a very big plus for Purview."
  • "Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features."

    • More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?
    Top Answer:It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.
    Read all 21 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure P...
    Top Answer:Currently, the licensing differs for the governance side compared to the risk and compliance side. On the governance side, the charges are based on the usage of Purview, including the data map, data… more »
    Read all 19 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?
    Top Answer:Data quality has been a highly requested feature among customers. While it was initially scheduled for release in December last year, I anticipate that this feature will be available soon this year. I… more »
    Read all 20 answers   →
    Ranking
    45th
    out of 57 in Data Governance
    Views
    95
    Comparisons
    26
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    out of 57 in Data Governance
    Views
    26,458
    Comparisons
    12,884
    Reviews
    45
    Average Words per Review
    1,368
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview
    Learn More
    iomete
    Video Not Available
    Microsoft
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    What is iomete?

    Modern lakehouse built on top of Apache Iceberg and Apache Spark. Includes: Serverless lakehouse, Serverless Spark Jobs, SQL editor, Advanced data catalog and built-in BI (or connect 3rd party BI e.g. Tableau, Looker).

    iomete's compute prices are equal to AWS on-demand pricing. No mark-ups. AWS users get the platform basically for free.

    Who Uses iomete?

    iomete provides a fully-managed, complete, open source, lakehouse platform for AWS users that want to become data-driven in an easy and cost-effective manner.

    Where can iomete be deployed?

    Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise)

    The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

    Sample Customers
    from Startups to Scale up and Inc 1000 companies
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    University11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Governance
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    iomete is ranked 45th in Data Governance while Microsoft Purview Data Governance is ranked 1st in Data Governance with 48 reviews. iomete is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Purview Data Governance is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Governance writes "User friendly with good documentation but needs to cover more non-Microsoft use cases". iomete is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Purview Data Governance is most compared with Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon and Microsoft Intune.

    See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

    We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.