We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Quality and Microsoft Data Quality Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality."The profiling feature in Informatica Data Quality is incredibly effective for data governance."
"The solution is applicable for both technical and business users."
"I like the connectivity and richness of features for the technical team, the maturity of the product, and that it had a cloud version. There is Informatica Cloud, and it is part of the Informatica Cloud platform."
"There are a couple of valuable features. One is that it is very quick on the profiling. So, you get a very fast snapshot of the type of data that you're looking at from the profiling perspective. It can highlight anomalies in the data."
"It is very useful for testing purposes and designing mappings for small projects. If you go for IDQ in the mapping itself, you can see the data. You can then correct it, and test it so easily. It is working fine. It is also stable, scalable, and easy to deploy."
"We use it for various use cases, including data provisioning, data validation, continuous monitoring of data quality, and data standardization."
"We are able to set rules, establish a data quality management platform, and monitor the quality."
"The user interface is flexible and the visibility of the data flow is amazing."
"This solution is particularly useful for data enrichment."
"Exploring the possibility of incorporating AI capabilities that can suggest additional rules would significantly streamline our data analysis process following data profiling."
"Although we are very satisfied with the design of the UI, executing tasks with it can be difficult."
"The tool's performance is an area that should be given further consideration."
"The ability of the product to leverage the power of big data could be improved."
"There's certainly room for improvement. One crucial area is generating detailed reports on file statuses. Presently, this is represented visually, often as graphs or charts. Such reporting could offer comprehensive insights into the areas that demand attention and further scrutiny."
"Their UI needs improvement. Their scorecards and reporting also need improvement. Their data quality reporting, especially their dashboards and scorecards, is lackluster at best. Its reporting capabilities are limited. If you want to do anything beyond its limited reporting capabilities, then you're going to have to use an external reporting tool such as Power BI or something like that."
"The tools required to migrate existing mappings and server rules through cloud data quality are not available."
"Managing the licenses with the on-premises version was difficult."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a six out of ten, with one being very easy and ten being extremely challenging. So, there is room for improvement in the setup process."
More Microsoft Data Quality Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Data Quality is ranked 1st in Data Quality with 18 reviews while Microsoft Data Quality Services is ranked 14th in Data Quality with 1 review. Informatica Data Quality is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Data Quality Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Quality writes "Offers cloud version, good connectivity and data profiling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Data Quality Services writes " Usefulness of data enrichment features, which can help improve data quality and accuracy". Informatica Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Quality, Talend Data Quality, Trillium TS Quality, Oracle Data Quality and SAP Information Steward, whereas Microsoft Data Quality Services is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.